The performance of quantitative D-dimer assays in Chinese clinical laboratories by analyzing data from National External quality Assessment Scheme
•D-dimer is routinely used for excluding venous thromboembolism.•This study provides EQA design and laboratory performance for D-dimer assay in China for the first time.•Expression unit should be required to label in package inserts by regulatory authority.•Laboratory professionals should follow ins...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinica chimica acta 2024-08, Vol.562, p.119880, Article 119880 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •D-dimer is routinely used for excluding venous thromboembolism.•This study provides EQA design and laboratory performance for D-dimer assay in China for the first time.•Expression unit should be required to label in package inserts by regulatory authority.•Laboratory professionals should follow instructions for use and prefer unmodified test systems for clinical safely application.•Harmonization of reporting units through collaborative efforts is the promising step.
To investigate performance of D-dimer assays in China and address analytical quality issues.
D-dimer assays data were collected from China National External Quality Assessment Scheme (China NEQAS) from 2014 to 2022. We analyzed reagents, assay results, reporting unit and cutoffs in 2022 China NEQAS. Interlaboratory coefficient variations (CVs) and influence of modified/unmodified test systems on CVs were investigated over 9 years.
There were 82 reagent brands in China NEQAS, but 55 reagent instructions did not indicate expression unit (DDU or FEU). Up to 7-fold of the ratio of max-to-min mean results was shown among different assays with same unit on the same sample. A prevalence of FEU (63.4%) over DDU (17.1%) was observed. Although 669 laboratories (37.9%) among 1766 laboratories used reagents without VTE exclusion claim, they also reported cutoffs. The CVs of only two assays were decreasing over years. CVs of modified test systems were higher than those of unmodified systems before improvement.
Expression unit should be required to label in package inserts by regulatory authority. Laboratory professionals should follow instructions for use and prefer unmodified test systems for clinical safely application. Harmonization of reporting units through collaborative efforts is the promising step. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0009-8981 1873-3492 1873-3492 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cca.2024.119880 |