Predicting impaired cerebrovascular reactivity and risk of hyperperfusion syndrome in carotid artery stenosis using BeamSAT magnetic resonance imaging

Pencil-beam presaturation (BeamSAT) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) produces selective magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) images of specific arteries, including the unilateral internal carotid artery (ICA-selective MRA) or vertebral artery (VA-selective MRA). We evaluate the influence of flow pat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the neurological sciences 2024-08, Vol.463, p.123114, Article 123114
Hauptverfasser: Ikeuchi, Yusuke, Kohta, Masaaki, Yamashita, Shunsuke, Yamanishi, Shunsuke, Yamaguchi, Yoji, Tanaka, Jun, Tanaka, Kazuhiro, Kimura, Hidehito, Fujita, Atsushi, Hosoda, Kohkichi, Kohmura, Eiji, Sasayama, Takashi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Pencil-beam presaturation (BeamSAT) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) produces selective magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) images of specific arteries, including the unilateral internal carotid artery (ICA-selective MRA) or vertebral artery (VA-selective MRA). We evaluate the influence of flow pattern, visualized using BeamSAT MRI, on preoperative cerebral hemodynamic status and postoperative hyperperfusion syndrome (HPS). Patients undergoing carotid artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy were categorized into two groups to evaluate flow pattern. Patients with neither crossflow on BeamSAT MRI nor mismatch in middle cerebral artery (MCA) signal intensity between ICA-selective and conventional MRA were classified into Group I, comprising 29 patients. Group II included all other patients comprising 19 patients, who were suspected of experiencing changes in intracranial flow patterns. Cerebral blood flow and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) were assessed using single-photon emission computed tomography, and potential HPS symptoms were retrospectively assessed by chart review. Preoperative ipsilateral CVR was significantly lower in Group II than in Group I (18.0% ± 20.0% vs. 48.3% ± 19.5%; P 
ISSN:0022-510X
1878-5883
1878-5883
DOI:10.1016/j.jns.2024.123114