Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab for patients with previously treated, advanced, triple‐negative breast cancer: Results from the triple‐negative breast cancer cohort of the phase 2 LEAP‐005 Study

Background Novel treatments are needed for patients with advanced, triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) that progresses or recurs after first‐line treatment with chemotherapy. The authors report results from the TNBC cohort of the multicohort, open‐label, single‐arm, phase 2 LEAP‐005 study of lenvat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2024-10, Vol.130 (19), p.3278-3288
Hauptverfasser: Chung, Hyun Cheol, Saada‐Bouzid, Esma, Longo, Federico, Yanez, Eduardo, Im, Seock‐Ah, Castanon, Eduardo, Desautels, Danielle N., Graham, Donna M., Garcia‐Corbacho, Javier, Lopez, Juanita, Dutcus, Corina, Okpara, Chinyere E., Ghori, Razi, Jin, Fan, Groisberg, Roman, Korakis, Iphigenie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Novel treatments are needed for patients with advanced, triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) that progresses or recurs after first‐line treatment with chemotherapy. The authors report results from the TNBC cohort of the multicohort, open‐label, single‐arm, phase 2 LEAP‐005 study of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03797326). Methods Eligible patients had metastatic or unresectable TNBC with disease progression after one or two lines of therapy. Patients received lenvatinib (20 mg daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks; up to 35 cycles). The primary end points were the objective response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, and safety (adverse events graded by the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0). Duration of response, progression‐free survival, and overall survival were secondary end points. Results Thirty‐one patients were enrolled. The objective response rate by investigator assessment was 23% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10%–41%). Overall, the objective response rate by blinded independent central review (BICR) was 32% (95% CI, 17%–51%); and, in patients who had programmed cell death ligand 1 combined positive scores ≥10 (n = 8) and
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/cncr.35387