Detection of myeloma-associated osteolytic bone lesions with energy-integrating and photon-counting detector CT

Background A recent innovation in computed tomography (CT) imaging has been the introduction of photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) systems, which are able to register the number and the energy level of incoming x‑ray photons and have smaller detector elements compared with conventional CT scanners...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiologe 2024-11, Vol.64 (Suppl 1), p.24-31
Hauptverfasser: Grözinger, Martin, Wennmann, Markus, Sawall, Stefan, Wehrse, Eckhard, Sedaghat, Sam, Neelsen, Christian, Bauer, Fabian, Goldschmidt, Hartmut, Weru, Vivienn, Ziener, Christian H., Kopp-Schneider, Annette, Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter, Rotkopf, Lukas T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background A recent innovation in computed tomography (CT) imaging has been the introduction of photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) systems, which are able to register the number and the energy level of incoming x‑ray photons and have smaller detector elements compared with conventional CT scanners that operate with energy-integrating detectors (EID-CT). Objectives The study aimed to evaluate the potential benefits of a novel, non-CE certified PCD-CT in detecting myeloma-associated osteolytic bone lesions (OL) compared with a state-of-the-art EID-CT. Materials and methods Nine patients with multiple myeloma stage III (according to Durie and Salmon) underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), EID-CT, and PCD-CT of the lower lumbar spine and pelvis. The PCD-CT and EID-CT images of all myeloma lesions that were visible in clinical MRI scans were reviewed by three radiologists for corresponding OL. Additionally, the visualization of destructions to cancellous or cortical bone, and trabecular structures, was compared between PCD-CT and EID-CT. Results Readers detected 21% more OL in PCD-CT than in EID-CT images (138 vs. 109; p  
ISSN:2731-7048
0033-832X
2731-7056
2731-7056
1432-2102
DOI:10.1007/s00117-024-01344-7