Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation with anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a comparison of postoperative outcomes

Purpose To determine of the impact of ALIF with minimally invasive unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UPSF) versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation (BPSF) on perioperative outcomes, radiographic outcomes, and the rates of fusion, subsidence, and adjacent segment stenosis. Methods All adult patients...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European spine journal 2024-09, Vol.33 (9), p.3476-3483
Hauptverfasser: Levy, Hannah A., Pumford, Andrew, Kelley, Brian, Allen, Tyler G., Pinter, Zachariah W., Girdler, Steven J., Bydon, Mohamad, Fogelson, Jeremy L., Elder, Benjamin D., Currier, Bradford, Nassr, Ahmad N., Karamian, Brian A., Freedman, Brett A., Sebastian, Arjun S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To determine of the impact of ALIF with minimally invasive unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UPSF) versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation (BPSF) on perioperative outcomes, radiographic outcomes, and the rates of fusion, subsidence, and adjacent segment stenosis. Methods All adult patients who underwent one-level ALIF with UPSF or BPSF at an academic institution between 2015 and 2022 were retrospectively identified. Postoperative outcomes including length of hospital stay (LOS), wound complications, readmissions, and revisions were determined. The rates of fusion, screw loosening, adjacent segment stenosis, and subsidence were assessed on one-year postoperative CT. Lumbar alignment including lumbar lordosis, L4-S1 lordosis, regional lordosis, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, and sacral slope were assessed on standing x-rays at preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final postoperative follow-up. Univariate and multivariate analysis compared outcomes across posterior fixation groups. Results A total of 60 patients were included (27 UPSF, 33 BPSF). Patients with UPSF were significantly younger ( p  = 0.011). Operative time was significantly greater in the BPSF group in univariate ( p  
ISSN:0940-6719
1432-0932
1432-0932
DOI:10.1007/s00586-024-08412-5