In vitro comparison of zinc-based, chlorhexidine, and essential oil mouth rinses

Chlorhexidine (CHX)-based mouth rinses are frequently prescribed following periodontal surgeries. A more recently available brand of zinc-based mouth rinses advertises one of its mouth rinses as a substitute for chlorhexidine. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, in vitro, the effects of this...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of periodontology (1970) 2024-07
Hauptverfasser: Lallier, Thomas E, Goldfarb, Brian S, Maney, Pooja
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Chlorhexidine (CHX)-based mouth rinses are frequently prescribed following periodontal surgeries. A more recently available brand of zinc-based mouth rinses advertises one of its mouth rinses as a substitute for chlorhexidine. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, in vitro, the effects of this brand of zinc-based mouth rinses on cell survival, cell motility, and gene expression of human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs). HGFs were exposed to essential oil (EO), CHX, and three types of one brand of zinc-based mouth rinses designed to treat breath malodor (ZnA), dry mouth (ZnB), and gingivitis (ZnC). Each mouth rinse was tested over a range of concentrations for its effects on HGF survival and motility. Gene expression of cytokines, interleukins, and growth factors were evaluated via reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), as a means to assess potential influences on inflammation and wound healing. Cell survival was significantly decreased for CHX and ZnC at 10% dilutions (p 
ISSN:0022-3492
1943-3670
1943-3670
DOI:10.1002/JPER.23-0619