Marginal integrity of prototype bioactive glass-doped resin composites in class II cavities
Objectives This in vitro study examined the marginal integrity of experimental composite materials doped with bioactive glass (BG). Materials and methods Class-II MOD cavities were prepared and restored with one of the following composite materials: a commercial composite material as a reference (Fi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral investigations 2024-07, Vol.28 (8), p.430, Article 430 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 430 |
container_title | Clinical oral investigations |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Mohn, Nike Par, Matej Gubler, Andrea Tauböck, Tobias T. |
description | Objectives
This in vitro study examined the marginal integrity of experimental composite materials doped with bioactive glass (BG).
Materials and methods
Class-II MOD cavities were prepared and restored with one of the following composite materials: a commercial composite material as a reference (Filtek Supreme XTE), an experimental composite doped with BG 45S5 (C-20), and an experimental composite doped with a fluoride-containing BG (F-20). Six experimental groups (
n
= 8) were used, as each of the three composites was applied with (+) or without (-) a universal adhesive (Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose). All specimens were subjected to thermocycling (10,000 x, 5–55 °C) and then additionally stored in artificial saliva for eight weeks. Scanning electron micrographs of the mesial and the distal box were taken at three time points (initial, after thermocycling, and after eight weeks of storage in artificial saliva). The margins were classified as “continuous” and “non-continuous” and the percentage of continuous margins (PCM) was statistically analyzed (α = 0.05).
Results
In most experimental groups, thermocycling led to a significant decrease in PCM, while the additional 8-week aging had no significant effect. F-20 + performed significantly better (
p
= 0.005) after 8 weeks storage in artificial saliva than the reference material with adhesive, while no statistically significant differences were observed at the other two time points. C-20 + exhibited significantly better PCM than the reference material with adhesive after thermocycling (
p
= 0.026) and after 8 weeks (
p
= 0.003).
Conclusions
Overall, the experimental composites with BG showed at least as good marginal adaptation as the commercial reference, with an indication of possible re-sealing of marginal gaps.
Clinical relevance
Maintaining or improving the marginal integrity of composite restorations is important to prevent microleakage and its likely consequences such as pulp irritation and secondary caries. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00784-024-05824-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3081300255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3081482352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-9dc43b13935923f44e1b047bcd116ee2b7c64c87f03ee96121d06bf38eee10723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0EoqXwAhyQJS5cAt6yHVHFUqmIC5w4WIkzqVylcbCdqn17XFIWceDg8Yzmm9-eH6FzSq4pIemNCyETEWHhxFmImwM0poInEU9TevgrH6ET55aEUJGk_BiNeE4o41k2Rm9PhV3otmiwbj0srPZbbGrcWeON33aAS20K5fUa8KIpnIsq00GFLTjdYmVWnXHag8O7atfHsxlWxVp7De4UHdVF4-Bsf0_Q6_3dy_Qxmj8_zKa380ixOPFRXinBS8pzHueM10IALYlIS1VRmgCwMlWJUFlaEw6QJ5TRiiRlzTMAoCRlfIKuBt3w6_cenJcr7RQ0TdGC6Z3kJKOcEBbHAb38gy5Nb8P6AyUyxuOdIBsoZY1zFmrZWb0q7FZSInfWy8F6GayXn9bLTRi62Ev35Qqq75EvrwPAB8CFVrsA-_P2P7IfQ4WPQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3081482352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Marginal integrity of prototype bioactive glass-doped resin composites in class II cavities</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Mohn, Nike ; Par, Matej ; Gubler, Andrea ; Tauböck, Tobias T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mohn, Nike ; Par, Matej ; Gubler, Andrea ; Tauböck, Tobias T.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
This in vitro study examined the marginal integrity of experimental composite materials doped with bioactive glass (BG).
Materials and methods
Class-II MOD cavities were prepared and restored with one of the following composite materials: a commercial composite material as a reference (Filtek Supreme XTE), an experimental composite doped with BG 45S5 (C-20), and an experimental composite doped with a fluoride-containing BG (F-20). Six experimental groups (
n
= 8) were used, as each of the three composites was applied with (+) or without (-) a universal adhesive (Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose). All specimens were subjected to thermocycling (10,000 x, 5–55 °C) and then additionally stored in artificial saliva for eight weeks. Scanning electron micrographs of the mesial and the distal box were taken at three time points (initial, after thermocycling, and after eight weeks of storage in artificial saliva). The margins were classified as “continuous” and “non-continuous” and the percentage of continuous margins (PCM) was statistically analyzed (α = 0.05).
Results
In most experimental groups, thermocycling led to a significant decrease in PCM, while the additional 8-week aging had no significant effect. F-20 + performed significantly better (
p
= 0.005) after 8 weeks storage in artificial saliva than the reference material with adhesive, while no statistically significant differences were observed at the other two time points. C-20 + exhibited significantly better PCM than the reference material with adhesive after thermocycling (
p
= 0.026) and after 8 weeks (
p
= 0.003).
Conclusions
Overall, the experimental composites with BG showed at least as good marginal adaptation as the commercial reference, with an indication of possible re-sealing of marginal gaps.
Clinical relevance
Maintaining or improving the marginal integrity of composite restorations is important to prevent microleakage and its likely consequences such as pulp irritation and secondary caries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1436-3771</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1432-6981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-3771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05824-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39012388</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adhesives ; Cavities ; Ceramics - chemistry ; Composite materials ; Composite Resins - chemistry ; Dental caries ; Dental Cavity Preparation ; Dental Marginal Adaptation ; Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods ; Dental restorative materials ; Dentistry ; Fluorides ; Fluorides - chemistry ; Glass - chemistry ; Humans ; In Vitro Techniques ; Irritation ; Materials Testing ; Medicine ; Micrographics ; Microleakage ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Reference materials ; Resin Cements - chemistry ; Resins ; Saliva ; Saliva, Artificial - chemistry ; Statistical analysis ; Surface Properties</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral investigations, 2024-07, Vol.28 (8), p.430, Article 430</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-9dc43b13935923f44e1b047bcd116ee2b7c64c87f03ee96121d06bf38eee10723</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2846-1840</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00784-024-05824-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00784-024-05824-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39012388$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mohn, Nike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Par, Matej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gubler, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tauböck, Tobias T.</creatorcontrib><title>Marginal integrity of prototype bioactive glass-doped resin composites in class II cavities</title><title>Clinical oral investigations</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Invest</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><description>Objectives
This in vitro study examined the marginal integrity of experimental composite materials doped with bioactive glass (BG).
Materials and methods
Class-II MOD cavities were prepared and restored with one of the following composite materials: a commercial composite material as a reference (Filtek Supreme XTE), an experimental composite doped with BG 45S5 (C-20), and an experimental composite doped with a fluoride-containing BG (F-20). Six experimental groups (
n
= 8) were used, as each of the three composites was applied with (+) or without (-) a universal adhesive (Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose). All specimens were subjected to thermocycling (10,000 x, 5–55 °C) and then additionally stored in artificial saliva for eight weeks. Scanning electron micrographs of the mesial and the distal box were taken at three time points (initial, after thermocycling, and after eight weeks of storage in artificial saliva). The margins were classified as “continuous” and “non-continuous” and the percentage of continuous margins (PCM) was statistically analyzed (α = 0.05).
Results
In most experimental groups, thermocycling led to a significant decrease in PCM, while the additional 8-week aging had no significant effect. F-20 + performed significantly better (
p
= 0.005) after 8 weeks storage in artificial saliva than the reference material with adhesive, while no statistically significant differences were observed at the other two time points. C-20 + exhibited significantly better PCM than the reference material with adhesive after thermocycling (
p
= 0.026) and after 8 weeks (
p
= 0.003).
Conclusions
Overall, the experimental composites with BG showed at least as good marginal adaptation as the commercial reference, with an indication of possible re-sealing of marginal gaps.
Clinical relevance
Maintaining or improving the marginal integrity of composite restorations is important to prevent microleakage and its likely consequences such as pulp irritation and secondary caries.</description><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>Cavities</subject><subject>Ceramics - chemistry</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental caries</subject><subject>Dental Cavity Preparation</subject><subject>Dental Marginal Adaptation</subject><subject>Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods</subject><subject>Dental restorative materials</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Fluorides</subject><subject>Fluorides - chemistry</subject><subject>Glass - chemistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Irritation</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Micrographics</subject><subject>Microleakage</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Reference materials</subject><subject>Resin Cements - chemistry</subject><subject>Resins</subject><subject>Saliva</subject><subject>Saliva, Artificial - chemistry</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><issn>1436-3771</issn><issn>1432-6981</issn><issn>1436-3771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0EoqXwAhyQJS5cAt6yHVHFUqmIC5w4WIkzqVylcbCdqn17XFIWceDg8Yzmm9-eH6FzSq4pIemNCyETEWHhxFmImwM0poInEU9TevgrH6ET55aEUJGk_BiNeE4o41k2Rm9PhV3otmiwbj0srPZbbGrcWeON33aAS20K5fUa8KIpnIsq00GFLTjdYmVWnXHag8O7atfHsxlWxVp7De4UHdVF4-Bsf0_Q6_3dy_Qxmj8_zKa380ixOPFRXinBS8pzHueM10IALYlIS1VRmgCwMlWJUFlaEw6QJ5TRiiRlzTMAoCRlfIKuBt3w6_cenJcr7RQ0TdGC6Z3kJKOcEBbHAb38gy5Nb8P6AyUyxuOdIBsoZY1zFmrZWb0q7FZSInfWy8F6GayXn9bLTRi62Ev35Qqq75EvrwPAB8CFVrsA-_P2P7IfQ4WPQw</recordid><startdate>20240716</startdate><enddate>20240716</enddate><creator>Mohn, Nike</creator><creator>Par, Matej</creator><creator>Gubler, Andrea</creator><creator>Tauböck, Tobias T.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2846-1840</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240716</creationdate><title>Marginal integrity of prototype bioactive glass-doped resin composites in class II cavities</title><author>Mohn, Nike ; Par, Matej ; Gubler, Andrea ; Tauböck, Tobias T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-9dc43b13935923f44e1b047bcd116ee2b7c64c87f03ee96121d06bf38eee10723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>Cavities</topic><topic>Ceramics - chemistry</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Composite Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental caries</topic><topic>Dental Cavity Preparation</topic><topic>Dental Marginal Adaptation</topic><topic>Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods</topic><topic>Dental restorative materials</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Fluorides</topic><topic>Fluorides - chemistry</topic><topic>Glass - chemistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Irritation</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Micrographics</topic><topic>Microleakage</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Reference materials</topic><topic>Resin Cements - chemistry</topic><topic>Resins</topic><topic>Saliva</topic><topic>Saliva, Artificial - chemistry</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mohn, Nike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Par, Matej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gubler, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tauböck, Tobias T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mohn, Nike</au><au>Par, Matej</au><au>Gubler, Andrea</au><au>Tauböck, Tobias T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Marginal integrity of prototype bioactive glass-doped resin composites in class II cavities</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle><stitle>Clin Oral Invest</stitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><date>2024-07-16</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>430</spage><pages>430-</pages><artnum>430</artnum><issn>1436-3771</issn><issn>1432-6981</issn><eissn>1436-3771</eissn><abstract>Objectives
This in vitro study examined the marginal integrity of experimental composite materials doped with bioactive glass (BG).
Materials and methods
Class-II MOD cavities were prepared and restored with one of the following composite materials: a commercial composite material as a reference (Filtek Supreme XTE), an experimental composite doped with BG 45S5 (C-20), and an experimental composite doped with a fluoride-containing BG (F-20). Six experimental groups (
n
= 8) were used, as each of the three composites was applied with (+) or without (-) a universal adhesive (Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose). All specimens were subjected to thermocycling (10,000 x, 5–55 °C) and then additionally stored in artificial saliva for eight weeks. Scanning electron micrographs of the mesial and the distal box were taken at three time points (initial, after thermocycling, and after eight weeks of storage in artificial saliva). The margins were classified as “continuous” and “non-continuous” and the percentage of continuous margins (PCM) was statistically analyzed (α = 0.05).
Results
In most experimental groups, thermocycling led to a significant decrease in PCM, while the additional 8-week aging had no significant effect. F-20 + performed significantly better (
p
= 0.005) after 8 weeks storage in artificial saliva than the reference material with adhesive, while no statistically significant differences were observed at the other two time points. C-20 + exhibited significantly better PCM than the reference material with adhesive after thermocycling (
p
= 0.026) and after 8 weeks (
p
= 0.003).
Conclusions
Overall, the experimental composites with BG showed at least as good marginal adaptation as the commercial reference, with an indication of possible re-sealing of marginal gaps.
Clinical relevance
Maintaining or improving the marginal integrity of composite restorations is important to prevent microleakage and its likely consequences such as pulp irritation and secondary caries.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>39012388</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00784-024-05824-x</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2846-1840</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1436-3771 |
ispartof | Clinical oral investigations, 2024-07, Vol.28 (8), p.430, Article 430 |
issn | 1436-3771 1432-6981 1436-3771 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3081300255 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adhesives Cavities Ceramics - chemistry Composite materials Composite Resins - chemistry Dental caries Dental Cavity Preparation Dental Marginal Adaptation Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods Dental restorative materials Dentistry Fluorides Fluorides - chemistry Glass - chemistry Humans In Vitro Techniques Irritation Materials Testing Medicine Micrographics Microleakage Microscopy, Electron, Scanning Reference materials Resin Cements - chemistry Resins Saliva Saliva, Artificial - chemistry Statistical analysis Surface Properties |
title | Marginal integrity of prototype bioactive glass-doped resin composites in class II cavities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T16%3A12%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Marginal%20integrity%20of%20prototype%20bioactive%20glass-doped%20resin%20composites%20in%20class%20II%20cavities&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20investigations&rft.au=Mohn,%20Nike&rft.date=2024-07-16&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=430&rft.pages=430-&rft.artnum=430&rft.issn=1436-3771&rft.eissn=1436-3771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00784-024-05824-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3081482352%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3081482352&rft_id=info:pmid/39012388&rfr_iscdi=true |