What Do We Know About Nurse Practitioner/Physician Care Models in Long-Term Care: Results of a Scoping Review

Due to the rise of the nurse practitioner (NP) role in long-term care settings, it is important to understand the underlying structures and processes that influence NP and physician care models. This scoping review aims to answer the question, “What are the structures, processes, and outcomes of car...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 2024-09, Vol.25 (9), p.105148, Article 105148
Hauptverfasser: Haslam-Larmer, Lynn, Krassikova, Alexandra, Spengler, Claudia, Wills, Aria, Keatings, Margaret, Babineau, Jessica, Robert, Benoit, Heer, Carrie, McAiney, Carrie, Bethell, Jennifer, Kay, Kelly, Kaasalainen, Sharon, Feldman, Sid, Martin-Misener, Ruth, Katz, Paul, May, Kathryn, McGilton, Katherine S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Due to the rise of the nurse practitioner (NP) role in long-term care settings, it is important to understand the underlying structures and processes that influence NP and physician care models. This scoping review aims to answer the question, “What are the structures, processes, and outcomes of care models involving NPs and physicians in long-term care (LTC) homes?” A secondary aim was to describe the structural enablers and barriers across care models. Seven databases were searched. Studies that described NPs and physicians working in LTC were identified and included in the review. We stratified the findings by care model and synthesized using the Donabedian model, which evaluates health care quality based on 3 dimensions: structure, process, and outcome. We then categorized macro, meso, and micro structural enablers and barriers. Sixty papers were included in the review. The main structural influencers within 5 care models included policies on scope of practice, clarity of role description, and workload. A limited number of papers referred to the process of enabling the development of a working relationship. Thirty-five (49%) studies described resident, staff, and health system outcomes. Although structural characteristics of NP and physician care models are described in-depth, there is less detail on the processes that occur within the NP and physician care models. We highlight structural barriers and enablers within the care models, allowing for recognition of the importance of organizational influence on the NP and physician relationship. Future work should focus on the processes of the relationships in the models by identifying the drivers and initiators of collaboration between NPs and physicians and how these relationships influence outcomes.
ISSN:1525-8610
1538-9375
1538-9375
DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105148