Abatacept retention and clinical effectiveness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a real‐world setting in Taiwan

Aim To evaluate real‐world abatacept retention and clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Taiwan. Methods This prospective, observational study enrolled patients with rheumatoid arthritis aged ≥20 years who received abatacept in real‐world practice. The primary endpoint was the a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of rheumatic diseases 2024-07, Vol.27 (7), p.e15199-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Kun‐Hung, Li, Ko‐Jen, Fang, Yao‐Fan, Hsieh, Song‐Chou, Chen, Ying‐Chou, Lee, Chyou‐Shen, Luo, Shue‐Fen, Cheng, Tien‐Tsai, Tsai, Wen Chan, Lo, Yu‐Chen, Lan, Joung‐Liang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim To evaluate real‐world abatacept retention and clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Taiwan. Methods This prospective, observational study enrolled patients with rheumatoid arthritis aged ≥20 years who received abatacept in real‐world practice. The primary endpoint was the abatacept retention rate at 24 months. Patients were categorized into subgroups based on abatacept treatment status and previous biological disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) therapy. Risk factors affecting abatacept retention were determined by regression analysis. Results A total of 212 patients were enrolled. The overall abatacept retention rate at 24 months among all patients was 59.9% (95% confidence interval 53.0%–66.6%). Patients who were ongoing users of abatacept and bDMARD‐naïve had the highest retention rate (76.3%); of these, 31.6% achieved low disease activity or remission after 2 years. Previous treatment with bDMARDs was associated with an increased risk of abatacept discontinuation (hazard ratio 1.99; p = .002). The most common reasons for abatacept discontinuation were drug switch (11.3%) and loss to follow‐up (6.1%). Abatacept was well‐tolerated with no new safety signals. Conclusion The 24‐month retention rate of abatacept was 59.9%; abatacept was associated with improved clinical outcomes and was well‐tolerated in the real‐world setting in Taiwan.
ISSN:1756-1841
1756-185X
1756-185X
DOI:10.1111/1756-185X.15199