Implementing evidence-based restrictive neonatal intensive care unit platelet transfusion guidelines

Platelet transfusions are life-saving treatments for specific populations of neonates. However, recent evidence indicates that liberal prophylactic platelet transfusion practices cause harm to premature neonates. New efforts to better balance benefits and risks are leading to the adoption of more re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of perinatology 2024-10, Vol.44 (10), p.1394-1401
Hauptverfasser: Christensen, Robert D., Bahr, Timothy M., Davenport, Patricia, Sola-Visner, Martha C., Ohls, Robin K., Ilstrup, Sarah J., Kelley, Walter E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Platelet transfusions are life-saving treatments for specific populations of neonates. However, recent evidence indicates that liberal prophylactic platelet transfusion practices cause harm to premature neonates. New efforts to better balance benefits and risks are leading to the adoption of more restrictive platelet transfusion guidelines in neonatal intensive care units (NICU). Although restrictive guidelines have the potential to improve outcomes, implementation barriers exist. We postulate that as neonatologists become more familiar with the data on the harm of liberal platelet transfusions, enthusiasm for restrictive guidelines will increase and barriers to implementation will decrease. Thus, we focused this educational review on; (1) the adverse effects of platelet transfusions to neonates, (2) awareness of platelet transfusion “refractoriness” in thrombocytopenic neonates and its association with poor outcomes, and (3) the impetus to find alternatives to transfusing platelets from adult donors to NICU patients.
ISSN:0743-8346
1476-5543
1476-5543
DOI:10.1038/s41372-024-02050-x