Validation of a computed tomography diagnostic model for differentiating fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

The diagnosis of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP) from other interstitial lung diseases, particularly idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), is often difficult. This study aimed to examine computed tomography (CT) findings that were useful for differentiating between fHP and IPF and to deve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory investigation 2024-09, Vol.62 (5), p.798-803
Hauptverfasser: Sumikawa, Hiromitsu, Komiya, Kosaku, Egashira, Ryoko, Tominaga, Junya, Ueno, Midori, Fukuda, Taiki, Yamada, Daisuke, Takei, Reoto, Kataoka, Kensuke, Kimura, Tomoki, Kondoh, Yasuhiro, Ejima, Masaru, Shimamura, Takashi, Tateishi, Tomoya, Tomioka, Hiromi, Miyazaki, Yasunari, Suda, Takafumi, Johkoh, Takeshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The diagnosis of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP) from other interstitial lung diseases, particularly idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), is often difficult. This study aimed to examine computed tomography (CT) findings that were useful for differentiating between fHP and IPF and to develop and validate a radiological diagnostic model. In this study, 246 patients (fHP, n = 104; IPF, n = 142) from two institutions were included and randomly divided into the test (n = 164) and validation (n = 82) groups (at a 2:1 ratio). Three radiologists evaluated CT findings, such as pulmonary fibrosis, small airway disease, and predominant distribution, and compared them between fHP and IPF using binomial logistic regression and multivariate analysis. A prognostic model was developed from the test group and validated with the validation group. Ground-glass opacity (GGO) with traction bronchiectasis (TB), honeycombing, hypoattenuation area, three-density pattern, diffuse craniocaudal distribution, peribronchovascular opacities in the upper lung, and random distribution were more common in fHP than in IPF. In multivariate analysis, GGO with TB, peribronchovascular opacities in the upper lung, and random distribution were significant features. The area under the curve of the fHP diagnostic model with the three aforementioned CT features was 0.733 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.655–0.811, p 
ISSN:2212-5345
2212-5353
2212-5353
DOI:10.1016/j.resinv.2024.07.002