Automated segmentation of brain metastases with deep learning: A multi-center, randomized crossover, multi-reader evaluation study

Artificial intelligence has been proposed for brain metastasis (BM) segmentation but it has not been fully clinically validated. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a system for BM segmentation. A deep-learning-based BM segmentation system (BMSS) was developed using contrast-enhanced M...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2024-11, Vol.26 (11), p.2140-2151
Hauptverfasser: Luo, Xiao, Yang, Yadi, Yin, Shaohan, Li, Hui, Shao, Ying, Zheng, Dechun, Li, Xinchun, Li, Jianpeng, Fan, Weixiong, Li, Jing, Ban, Xiaohua, Lian, Shanshan, Zhang, Yun, Yang, Qiuxia, Zhang, Weijing, Zhang, Cheng, Ma, Lidi, Luo, Yingwei, Zhou, Fan, Wang, Shiyuan, Lin, Cuiping, Li, Jiao, Luo, Ma, He, Jianxun, Xu, Guixiao, Gao, Yaozong, Shen, Dinggang, Sun, Ying, Mou, Yonggao, Zhang, Rong, Xie, Chuanmiao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Artificial intelligence has been proposed for brain metastasis (BM) segmentation but it has not been fully clinically validated. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a system for BM segmentation. A deep-learning-based BM segmentation system (BMSS) was developed using contrast-enhanced MR images from 488 patients with 10338 brain metastases. A randomized crossover, multi-reader study was then conducted to evaluate the performance of the BMSS for BM segmentation using data prospectively collected from 50 patients with 203 metastases at 5 centers. Five radiology residents and 5 attending radiologists were randomly assigned to contour the same prospective set in assisted and unassisted modes. Aided and unaided Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) and contouring times per lesion were compared. The BMSS alone yielded a median DSC of 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.90-0.92) in the multi-center set and showed comparable performance between the internal and external sets (P = .67). With BMSS assistance, the readers increased the median DSC from 0.87 (0.87-0.88) to 0.92 (0.92-0.92) (P 
ISSN:1522-8517
1523-5866
1523-5866
DOI:10.1093/neuonc/noae113