Task-based image quality assessment of an intraoperative CBCT for spine surgery compared with conventional CT
To analyze the image quality of a novel, state-of-the art platform for CBCT image-guided spine surgery, focusing particularly on the dose–effectiveness compared with conventional CT (the gold standard for postoperative assessment). The ClarifEye platform (Philips Healthcare) with integrated augmente...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physica medica 2024-08, Vol.124, p.103426, Article 103426 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To analyze the image quality of a novel, state-of-the art platform for CBCT image-guided spine surgery, focusing particularly on the dose–effectiveness compared with conventional CT (the gold standard for postoperative assessment).
The ClarifEye platform (Philips Healthcare) with integrated augmented-reality surgical navigation, has been compared with a GE Revolution CT (GE Healthcare). The 3D spatial resolution (TTF) and noise (NPS) were evaluated considering relevant feature contrasts (200–900 HU) and background noise for differently sized patients (200–300 mm water-equivalent diameter). These measures were used to determine the noise equivalent quanta (NEQ) and observer model detectability.
The CBCT system exhibited a linear response with 50% TTF at 5.7 cycles/cm (10% TTF at 9.2 cycles/cm), and the axial noise power peaking at about 3.6 cycles/cm (average frequency of 4.1 cycles/cm). The noise magnitude and texture differed markedly compared to iteratively reconstructed CT images (GE ASiR-V). The CBCT system had 26% lower detectability for a high-frequency task (related to edge detection) compared with CT images reconstructed using the Bone kernel combined with ASiR-V 50%. Likewise, it had 18% lower detectability for low- and mid-frequency tasks compared with CT images reconstructed using the Standard kernel. This difference translates to 50%–80% higher CBCT imaging doses required to match the CT image quality.
The ClarifEye platform demonstrates intraoperative CBCT-imaging capabilities that under certain circumstances are comparable with conventional CT. However, due to limited dose–effectiveness, a trade-off between timeliness and radiation exposure must be considered if end-of-procedure CBCT is to replace postoperative CT.
•A detailed account of the image quality of the ClarifEye platform for spine surgery.•The CBCT-imaging capabilities are in some instances comparable to conventional CT.•50%–80% higher CBCT imaging doses may be required to match postoperative CT imaging.•End-of-procedure CBCT may replace postoperative CT at the cost of patient exposure. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1120-1797 1724-191X 1724-191X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103426 |