Optimizing outcomes in multicompartmental brain tumor surgery: A comparative study of integrated endoscopic and microsurgical techniques versus endoscope-assisted microsurgery

Multicompartmental lesions within the central nervous system are challenging due to their complex anatomy. This study evaluates the efficacy, safety, and utility of hybrid endoscopic and microsurgery versus endoscope-assisted microsurgery(EAM) for excising these lesions. A retrospective comparative...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical neuroscience 2024-08, Vol.126, p.284-293
Hauptverfasser: Chandra Jha, Vikas, Jain, Rahul, Saran Sinha, Vivek, Kumar, Nitish, Verma, Gaurav
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Multicompartmental lesions within the central nervous system are challenging due to their complex anatomy. This study evaluates the efficacy, safety, and utility of hybrid endoscopic and microsurgery versus endoscope-assisted microsurgery(EAM) for excising these lesions. A retrospective comparative analysis was conducted on patients who underwent multicompartmental brain tumor surgery, utilizing either hybrid endoscopic and microsurgical techniques with the Endocameleon Hopkins telescope featuring a rotating lens system and knob (Karl Storz GmbH & Co., Tuttlingen, Germany), alternately used with a microscope (ZEISS PENTERO 800 S) (Group 1, n = 69), or endoscope-assisted microsurgery employing a fully high-definition, 45° angled endoscopic tool, QEVO®, integrated into the digital surgical microscope KINEVO 900 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Oberkochen, Germany) as a plug-in feature (Group 2, n = 63), from July 2018 to March 2024. Data on demographics, clinical presentation, lesion characteristics, surgical details, and outcomes were meticulously collected and analyzed using rigorous statistical methods, including t-tests and chi-square tests. Compared to Group 2, Group 1 had better ease of dissection and visualization of bleeders (p = 0.01) and fewer postoperative hematomas (p = 0.04). Surgical times were similar (p = 0.134). Postoperative follow-up revealed fewer recurrences in Group 1, though not statistically significant (p = 0.33). Group 1 patients reported higher cosmetic satisfaction and shorter hospital stays (p = 0.002). Logistic regression identified tumor vascularity(p = 0.001) and ease of dissection(p = 0.008) as significant factors for recurrence. Hybrid endoscopic and microsurgery demonstrated superior intraoperative visualization, ease of dissection, and postoperative outcomes compared to endoscope-assisted microsurgery with the Quevo device. These findings suggest that the integrated approach may offer better outcomes for multicompartmental lesion excision regarding safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction.
ISSN:0967-5868
1532-2653
1532-2653
DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2024.06.028