Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular mechanics in individuals with mitral valve prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose During the last decade, a number of echocardiographic studies have employed speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) for assessing myocardial deformation properties in individuals with mitral valve prolapse (MVP), reporting not univocal results. Accordingly, we performed a systematic review a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The international journal of cardiovascular imaging 2024-08, Vol.40 (8), p.1617-1629
Hauptverfasser: Sonaglioni, Andrea, Fagiani, Valeria, Nicolosi, Gian Luigi, Lombardo, Michele
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose During the last decade, a number of echocardiographic studies have employed speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) for assessing myocardial deformation properties in individuals with mitral valve prolapse (MVP), reporting not univocal results. Accordingly, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the main findings of these studies and to examine the overall influence of MVP on left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS). Methods All echocardiographic studies assessing conventional echoDoppler parameters and myocardial strain indices in MVP individuals vs. controls without MVP, selected from PubMed and EMBASE databases, were included. The risk of bias was assessed by using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment of Case-Control Studies. Continuous data (LV-GLS) were pooled as a standardized mean difference (SMD) comparing MVP group with healthy controls. The overall SMD of LV-GLS was calculated using the random-effect model. Results The full-texts of 15 studies with 1088 individuals with MVP and 591 healthy controls were analyzed. Average LV-GLS magnitude was significantly, even though modestly, reduced in MVP individuals in comparison to controls (19.4 ± 3.4% vs. 21.1 ± 2.8%, P  
ISSN:1875-8312
1569-5794
1875-8312
1573-0743
DOI:10.1007/s10554-024-03179-8