Beyond race: social vulnerability and access to metabolic and bariatric surgery

Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is under-accessed by non-White patients, who are disproportionately affected by obesity. We hypothesized that unique barriers experienced by socially vulnerable patients drive disparate MBS utilization. To determine whether socially vulnerable patients experienc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgery for obesity and related diseases 2024-11, Vol.20 (11), p.1146-1153
Hauptverfasser: Councell, Kayla A., Bryan, Ava Ferguson, Polcari, Ann M., McRae, Caridad, Prachand, Vivek N., Hussain, Mustafa, Vigneswaran, Yalini
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is under-accessed by non-White patients, who are disproportionately affected by obesity. We hypothesized that unique barriers experienced by socially vulnerable patients drive disparate MBS utilization. To determine whether socially vulnerable patients experience greater attrition and face more insurance-mandated medical weight management (MWM) requirements. Urban, academic center. This retrospective cohort study included adults evaluated for MBS in 2018. Social vulnerability was determined using the 2018 Social Vulnerability Index. Outcomes included attrition, or failure to undergo surgery within 1year, and the number and duration of MWM requirements. Multivariable logistic regression and negative binomial regression tested these associations. In 2018, 339 patients were evaluated for MBS (83% female, 70% Black). The attrition rate was 57%. On adjusted analyses, patients in the highest social vulnerability quartile had double the odds of attrition compared to their least vulnerable counterparts (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.11-4.92, P = .03). Highly vulnerable patients had double the number (IRR 2.29, 95% CI 1.42-3.72, P = .001) and nearly quadruple the duration (IRR 3.90, 95% CI 1.93-7.86, P < .001) of MWM requirements compared to those with low social vulnerability. Odds of attrition increased by 11% and 20% for each additional MWM visit (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.20, P = .02) and month (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.08-1.33, P = .001), respectively. Patients with high social vulnerability were less likely to undergo MBS and faced more insurance-mandated preoperative requirements, which independently predicted attrition. Insurance-mandated MWM is inequitable and may contribute to disparate care of patients with severe obesity. •Patients with high social vulnerability were less likely to have bariatric surgery.•Highly vulnerable patients had more insurance-mandated preoperative requirements.•Patients with high social vulnerability were predominantly Black.•Insurance-mandated medical weight management was associated with attrition.
ISSN:1550-7289
1878-7533
1878-7533
DOI:10.1016/j.soard.2024.05.015