Quality of life measurement in assessing treatment effectiveness in urticaria: European experts position statement

In this study, the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Task Forces on Quality of Life and Patient‐Oriented Outcomes and Urticaria and Angioedema has examined the Health‐Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measurement in the treatment of urticaria. The Dermatology Life Quality Index wa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of dermatology 2024-12, Vol.63 (12), p.1657-1667
Hauptverfasser: Chernyshov, Pavel Viktorovich, Tomas‐Aragones, Lucia, Zuberbier, Torsten, Kocatürk, Emek, Manolache, Liana, Pustisek, Nives, Svensson, Åke, Marron, Servando E., Sampogna, Francesca, Bewley, Anthony, Salavastru, Carmen, Koumaki, Dimitra, Augustin, Matthias, Linder, Dennis, Abeni, Damiano, Salek, Sam S., Szepietowski, Jacek C., Jemec, Gregor B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this study, the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Task Forces on Quality of Life and Patient‐Oriented Outcomes and Urticaria and Angioedema has examined the Health‐Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measurement in the treatment of urticaria. The Dermatology Life Quality Index was the most frequently used HRQoL instrument in clinical trials on urticaria. Many reports of clinical trials of urticaria gave no exact numeric results related to HRQoL changes, making clear conclusions and comparisons with other studies impossible. The interpretation of HRQoL impairment data is more difficult when assessed by instruments without severity stratification systems. The minimal clinically significant difference (MCID) is a more clinically oriented and relevant parameter than depending on statistically significant changes in HRQoL scores. Therefore, using HRQoL instruments with established MCID data in clinical trials and clinical practice is preferred.
ISSN:0011-9059
1365-4632
1365-4632
DOI:10.1111/ijd.17366