Beyond black-box models: explainable AI for embryo ploidy prediction and patient-centric consultation

Purpose To determine if an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) model enhances the accuracy and transparency of predicting embryo ploidy status based on embryonic characteristics and clinical data. Methods This retrospective study utilized a dataset of 1908 blastocyst embryos. The dataset inclu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 2024-09, Vol.41 (9), p.2349-2358
Hauptverfasser: Luong, Thi-My-Trang, Ho, Nguyen-Tuong, Hwu, Yuh-Ming, Lin, Shyr-Yeu, Ho, Jason Yen-Ping, Wang, Ruey-Sheng, Lee, Yi-Xuan, Tan, Shun-Jen, Lee, Yi-Rong, Huang, Yung-Ling, Hsu, Yi-Ching, Le, Nguyen-Quoc-Khanh, Tzeng, Chii-Ruey
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To determine if an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) model enhances the accuracy and transparency of predicting embryo ploidy status based on embryonic characteristics and clinical data. Methods This retrospective study utilized a dataset of 1908 blastocyst embryos. The dataset includes ploidy status, morphokinetic features, morphology grades, and 11 clinical variables. Six machine learning (ML) models including Random Forest (RF), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), AdaBoost (ADA), and Light Gradient-Boosting Machine (LGBM) were trained to predict ploidy status probabilities across three distinct datasets: high-grade embryos (HGE, n  = 1107), low-grade embryos (LGE, n  = 364), and all-grade embryos (AGE, n  = 1471). The model’s performance was interpreted using XAI, including SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) techniques. Results The mean maternal age was 38.5 ± 3.85 years. The Random Forest (RF) model exhibited superior performance compared to the other five ML models, achieving an accuracy of 0.749 and an AUC of 0.808 for AGE. In the external test set, the RF model achieved an accuracy of 0.714 and an AUC of 0.750 (95% CI, 0.702–0.796). SHAP’s feature impact analysis highlighted that maternal age, paternal age, time to blastocyst (tB), and day 5 morphology grade significantly impacted the predictive model. In addition, LIME offered specific case-ploidy prediction probabilities, revealing the model’s assigned values for each variable within a finite range. Conclusion The model highlights the potential of using XAI algorithms to enhance ploidy prediction, optimize embryo selection as patient-centric consultation, and provides reliability and transparent insights into the decision-making process.
ISSN:1058-0468
1573-7330
1573-7330
DOI:10.1007/s10815-024-03178-7