Global prevalence of musculoskeletal pain in rural and urban populations. A systematic review with meta‐analysis. Musculoskeletal pain in rural and urban populations

Introduction To systematically compare the global prevalence of musculoskeletal pain and care‐seeking in rural and urban populations. Methods A systematic review with meta‐analysis of observational studies reporting a direct comparison of rural and urban populations was conducted worldwide and inclu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Australian journal of rural health 2024-10, Vol.32 (5), p.864-876
Hauptverfasser: Mesa‐Castrillon, Carlos I., Beckenkamp, Paula R., Ferreira, Manuela, Simic, Milena, Davis, Phillip R., Michell, Antonio, Pappas, Evangelos, Luscombe, Georgina, Noronha, Marcos De, Ferreira, Paulo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction To systematically compare the global prevalence of musculoskeletal pain and care‐seeking in rural and urban populations. Methods A systematic review with meta‐analysis of observational studies reporting a direct comparison of rural and urban populations was conducted worldwide and included back, knee, hip, shoulder, neck pain and a broad diagnosis of ‘musculoskeletal pain’. A search strategy combining terms related to ‘prevalence’, ‘musculoskeletal pain’ and ‘rural’ was used on the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and rural and remote health from their inception to 1 June 2022. Random‐effects meta‐analysis was used to pool the data. Results were presented as odds ratios (OR) along with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results A total of 42 studies from 24 countries were included with a total population of 489 439 participants. The quality scores for the included studies, using the modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale tool, showed an average score of 0.78/1, which represents an overall good quality. The pooled analysis showed statistically greater odds of hip (OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.23–2.15), shoulder (OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.06–1.90) and overall musculoskeletal pain (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.08–1.47) in rural populations compared to urban populations. Although the odds of seeking treatment were higher in rural populations this relationship was not statistically significant (OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.55–1.03). Conclusion Very low‐certainty evidence suggests that musculoskeletal, hip and shoulder pain are more prevalent in rural than urban areas, although neck, back and knee pain, along with care‐seeking, showed no significant difference between these populations. Strategies aimed to reduce the burden of musculoskeletal pain should consider the specific needs and limited access to quality evidence‐based care for musculoskeletal pain of rural populations.
ISSN:1038-5282
1440-1584
1440-1584
DOI:10.1111/ajr.13161