Shining light on diurnal variation of non‐photochemical quenching: Impact of gradual light intensity patterns on short‐term NPQ over a day

Maximal sunlight intensity varies diurnally due to the earth's rotation. Whether this slow diurnal pattern influences the photoprotective capacity of plants throughout the day is unknown. We investigated diurnal variation in NPQ, along with NPQ capacity, induction, and relaxation kinetics after...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physiologia plantarum 2024-07, Vol.176 (4), p.e14410-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Lazzarin, Martina, Driever, Steven, Wassenaar, Maarten, Marcelis, Leo F. M., Ieperen, Wim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Maximal sunlight intensity varies diurnally due to the earth's rotation. Whether this slow diurnal pattern influences the photoprotective capacity of plants throughout the day is unknown. We investigated diurnal variation in NPQ, along with NPQ capacity, induction, and relaxation kinetics after transitions to high light, in tomato plants grown under diurnal parabolic (DP) or constant (DC) light intensity regimes. DP light intensity peaked at midday (470 μmol m‐2 s‐1) while DC stayed constant at 300 μmol m‐2 s‐1 at a similar 12‐hour photoperiod and daily light integral. NPQs were higher in the morning and afternoon at lower light intensities in DP compared to DC, except shortly after dawn. NPQ capacity increased from midday to the end of the day, with higher values in DP than in DC. At high light ΦPSII did not vary throughout the day, while ΦNPQ varied consistently with NPQ capacity. Reduced ΦNO suggested less susceptibility to photodamage at the end of the day. NPQ induction was faster at midday than at the start of the day and in DC than in DP, with overshoot occurring in the morning and midday but not at the end of the day. NPQ relaxation was faster in DP than in DC. The xanthophyll de‐epoxidation state and reduced demand for photochemistry could not explain the observed diurnal variations in photoprotective capacity. In conclusion, this study showed diurnal variation in regulated photoprotective capacity at moderate growth light intensity, which was not explained by instantaneous light intensity or increasing photoinhibition over the day and was influenced by acclimation to constant light intensity.
ISSN:0031-9317
1399-3054
1399-3054
DOI:10.1111/ppl.14410