Cardiac computed tomography-derived coronary artery volume to myocardial mass in patients with severe coronary artery disease

Coronary artery lumen volume (V) to myocardial mass (M) ratio (V/M) can show the mismatch between epicardial coronary arteries and the underlying myocardium. The V, M and V/M were obtained from the coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) of patients in the FAST-TRACK CABG study, the first-in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography 2024-09, Vol.18 (5), p.478-488
Hauptverfasser: Kageyama, Shigetaka, Taylor, Charles A., Updegrove, Adam, Garg, Scot, Masuda, Shinichiro, Revaiah, Pruthvi Chenniganahosahalli, Kageyama, Momoko, Tsai, Tsung-Ying, Miyashita, Kotaro, Tobe, Akihiro, Tanaka, Kaoru, De Mey, Johan, La Meir, Mark, Schneider, Ulrich, Doenst, Torsten, Teichgräber, Ulf, Saima, Mushtaq, Pompilio, Giulio, Andreini, Daniele, Pontone, Gianluca, Puskas, John D., Gupta, Himanshu, Morel, Marie-Angele, Serruys, Patrick W., Onuma, Yoshinobu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Coronary artery lumen volume (V) to myocardial mass (M) ratio (V/M) can show the mismatch between epicardial coronary arteries and the underlying myocardium. The V, M and V/M were obtained from the coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) of patients in the FAST-TRACK CABG study, the first-in-human trial of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) guided solely by CCTA and fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA (FFRCT) in patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD). The correlations between V/M ratios and baseline characteristics were determined and compared with those from the ADVANCE registry, an unselected cohort of historical controls with chronic CAD. The V/M ratio was obtained in 106 of the 114 pre-CABG CCTAs. Mean age was 65.6 years and 87% of them were male. The anatomical SYNTAX score from CCTA was significantly higher than the functional SYNTAX score derived using FFRCT [43.1 (15.2) vs 41.1 (16.5), p ​
ISSN:1934-5925
1876-861X
1876-861X
DOI:10.1016/j.jcct.2024.06.010