Electrochemical Generation of Hydroxide and Hydrogen Peroxide for Hydrolysis of Sulfuryl Fluoride Fumigant

The post-harvest fumigant, sulfuryl fluoride (SO2F2), is a >1000-fold more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide and methane. Pilot studies have shown that SO2F2 fumes vented from fumigation chambers can be captured and hydrolyzed by hydroxide (OH–) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) at pH ∼ 12 in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 2024-07, Vol.72 (27), p.15133-15141
Hauptverfasser: Weng, Cindy, Napier, Cade, Katte, Cedric, Walse, Spencer S., Mitch, William A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 15141
container_issue 27
container_start_page 15133
container_title Journal of agricultural and food chemistry
container_volume 72
creator Weng, Cindy
Napier, Cade
Katte, Cedric
Walse, Spencer S.
Mitch, William A.
description The post-harvest fumigant, sulfuryl fluoride (SO2F2), is a >1000-fold more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide and methane. Pilot studies have shown that SO2F2 fumes vented from fumigation chambers can be captured and hydrolyzed by hydroxide (OH–) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) at pH ∼ 12 in a scrubber, producing SO4 2– and F– as waste salts. To reduce the costs and challenges associated with purchasing and mixing these reagents onsite, this study evaluates the electrochemical generation of OH– and H2O2 within spent scrubbing solution, taking advantage of the waste SO4 2– and F– as free sources of electrolyte. The study used a gas diffusion electrode constructed from carbon paper coated with carbon black as a catalyst selective for the reduction of O2 to H2O2. Under galvanostatic conditions, the study evaluated the effect of electrochemical conditions, including applied cathodic current density and electrolyte strength. Within an electrolyte containing 200 mM SO4 2– and 400 mM F–, comparable to the waste salts generated by a SO2F2 scrubbing event, the system produced 250 mM H2O2 at pH 12.6 within 4 h with a Faradaic efficiency of 98.8% for O2 reduction to H2O2. In a scrubbing-water sample from lab-scale fumigation, the system generated ∼200 mM H2O2 at pH 13.5 within 4 h with a Faradaic efficiency of 75.6%. A comparison of the costs to purchase NaOH and H2O2 against the electricity costs for electrochemical treatment indicated that the electrochemical approach could be 38–71% lower, depending on the local cost of electricity.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.jafc.4c00864
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3073712257</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3073712257</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a252t-427b16cb5bd9df7d46f2410b733d99d4380207faab8d6ad99bdf4053e29d1613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMoOj72rqRLF3a8eTXtUsQZBUHB2Zc0D-2QNpq04Px7M3Z0J65CDt93FvcgdI5hjoHga6nifC2tmjMFUBZsD80wJ5BzjMt9NIPE5CUv8BE6jnENieECDtERLSvGRAEztL5zRg3BqzfTtUq6bGl6E-TQ-j7zNrvf6OA_W20y2evp92r67NnsUuvDlLpNbOPWeBmdHcPGZQs3-rBlFmPXvsp-OEUHVrpoznbvCVot7la39_nj0_Lh9uYxl4STIWdENLhQDW90pa3QrLCEYWgEpbqqNKMlEBBWyqbUhUxRoy0DTg2pNC4wPUGXU-178B-jiUPdtVEZ52Rv_BhrijktWAVJ-RcFQQUmhIuEwoSq4GMMxtbvoe1k2NQY6u0Wddqi3m5R77ZIysWufWw6o3-Fn-Mn4GoCvlU_hj6d5e--L45elkE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3073712257</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electrochemical Generation of Hydroxide and Hydrogen Peroxide for Hydrolysis of Sulfuryl Fluoride Fumigant</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Weng, Cindy ; Napier, Cade ; Katte, Cedric ; Walse, Spencer S. ; Mitch, William A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Weng, Cindy ; Napier, Cade ; Katte, Cedric ; Walse, Spencer S. ; Mitch, William A.</creatorcontrib><description>The post-harvest fumigant, sulfuryl fluoride (SO2F2), is a &gt;1000-fold more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide and methane. Pilot studies have shown that SO2F2 fumes vented from fumigation chambers can be captured and hydrolyzed by hydroxide (OH–) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) at pH ∼ 12 in a scrubber, producing SO4 2– and F– as waste salts. To reduce the costs and challenges associated with purchasing and mixing these reagents onsite, this study evaluates the electrochemical generation of OH– and H2O2 within spent scrubbing solution, taking advantage of the waste SO4 2– and F– as free sources of electrolyte. The study used a gas diffusion electrode constructed from carbon paper coated with carbon black as a catalyst selective for the reduction of O2 to H2O2. Under galvanostatic conditions, the study evaluated the effect of electrochemical conditions, including applied cathodic current density and electrolyte strength. Within an electrolyte containing 200 mM SO4 2– and 400 mM F–, comparable to the waste salts generated by a SO2F2 scrubbing event, the system produced 250 mM H2O2 at pH 12.6 within 4 h with a Faradaic efficiency of 98.8% for O2 reduction to H2O2. In a scrubbing-water sample from lab-scale fumigation, the system generated ∼200 mM H2O2 at pH 13.5 within 4 h with a Faradaic efficiency of 75.6%. A comparison of the costs to purchase NaOH and H2O2 against the electricity costs for electrochemical treatment indicated that the electrochemical approach could be 38–71% lower, depending on the local cost of electricity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8561</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1520-5118</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.4c00864</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38944760</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry ; carbon ; carbon dioxide ; catalysts ; electricity ; Electrochemical Techniques - methods ; electrochemistry ; electrodes ; electrolytes ; food chemistry ; Fumigation ; greenhouse gases ; hydrogen peroxide ; Hydrogen Peroxide - chemistry ; Hydrolysis ; Hydroxides - chemistry ; methane ; Pesticides - chemistry ; soot ; Sulfinic Acids - chemistry ; sulfuryl fluoride</subject><ispartof>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2024-07, Vol.72 (27), p.15133-15141</ispartof><rights>2024 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a252t-427b16cb5bd9df7d46f2410b733d99d4380207faab8d6ad99bdf4053e29d1613</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4917-0938 ; 0000-0003-4071-2515</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jafc.4c00864$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jafc.4c00864$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,2752,27057,27905,27906,56719,56769</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38944760$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weng, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Napier, Cade</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katte, Cedric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walse, Spencer S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitch, William A.</creatorcontrib><title>Electrochemical Generation of Hydroxide and Hydrogen Peroxide for Hydrolysis of Sulfuryl Fluoride Fumigant</title><title>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</title><addtitle>J. Agric. Food Chem</addtitle><description>The post-harvest fumigant, sulfuryl fluoride (SO2F2), is a &gt;1000-fold more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide and methane. Pilot studies have shown that SO2F2 fumes vented from fumigation chambers can be captured and hydrolyzed by hydroxide (OH–) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) at pH ∼ 12 in a scrubber, producing SO4 2– and F– as waste salts. To reduce the costs and challenges associated with purchasing and mixing these reagents onsite, this study evaluates the electrochemical generation of OH– and H2O2 within spent scrubbing solution, taking advantage of the waste SO4 2– and F– as free sources of electrolyte. The study used a gas diffusion electrode constructed from carbon paper coated with carbon black as a catalyst selective for the reduction of O2 to H2O2. Under galvanostatic conditions, the study evaluated the effect of electrochemical conditions, including applied cathodic current density and electrolyte strength. Within an electrolyte containing 200 mM SO4 2– and 400 mM F–, comparable to the waste salts generated by a SO2F2 scrubbing event, the system produced 250 mM H2O2 at pH 12.6 within 4 h with a Faradaic efficiency of 98.8% for O2 reduction to H2O2. In a scrubbing-water sample from lab-scale fumigation, the system generated ∼200 mM H2O2 at pH 13.5 within 4 h with a Faradaic efficiency of 75.6%. A comparison of the costs to purchase NaOH and H2O2 against the electricity costs for electrochemical treatment indicated that the electrochemical approach could be 38–71% lower, depending on the local cost of electricity.</description><subject>Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>carbon</subject><subject>carbon dioxide</subject><subject>catalysts</subject><subject>electricity</subject><subject>Electrochemical Techniques - methods</subject><subject>electrochemistry</subject><subject>electrodes</subject><subject>electrolytes</subject><subject>food chemistry</subject><subject>Fumigation</subject><subject>greenhouse gases</subject><subject>hydrogen peroxide</subject><subject>Hydrogen Peroxide - chemistry</subject><subject>Hydrolysis</subject><subject>Hydroxides - chemistry</subject><subject>methane</subject><subject>Pesticides - chemistry</subject><subject>soot</subject><subject>Sulfinic Acids - chemistry</subject><subject>sulfuryl fluoride</subject><issn>0021-8561</issn><issn>1520-5118</issn><issn>1520-5118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMoOj72rqRLF3a8eTXtUsQZBUHB2Zc0D-2QNpq04Px7M3Z0J65CDt93FvcgdI5hjoHga6nifC2tmjMFUBZsD80wJ5BzjMt9NIPE5CUv8BE6jnENieECDtERLSvGRAEztL5zRg3BqzfTtUq6bGl6E-TQ-j7zNrvf6OA_W20y2evp92r67NnsUuvDlLpNbOPWeBmdHcPGZQs3-rBlFmPXvsp-OEUHVrpoznbvCVot7la39_nj0_Lh9uYxl4STIWdENLhQDW90pa3QrLCEYWgEpbqqNKMlEBBWyqbUhUxRoy0DTg2pNC4wPUGXU-178B-jiUPdtVEZ52Rv_BhrijktWAVJ-RcFQQUmhIuEwoSq4GMMxtbvoe1k2NQY6u0Wddqi3m5R77ZIysWufWw6o3-Fn-Mn4GoCvlU_hj6d5e--L45elkE</recordid><startdate>20240710</startdate><enddate>20240710</enddate><creator>Weng, Cindy</creator><creator>Napier, Cade</creator><creator>Katte, Cedric</creator><creator>Walse, Spencer S.</creator><creator>Mitch, William A.</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4917-0938</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4071-2515</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240710</creationdate><title>Electrochemical Generation of Hydroxide and Hydrogen Peroxide for Hydrolysis of Sulfuryl Fluoride Fumigant</title><author>Weng, Cindy ; Napier, Cade ; Katte, Cedric ; Walse, Spencer S. ; Mitch, William A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a252t-427b16cb5bd9df7d46f2410b733d99d4380207faab8d6ad99bdf4053e29d1613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>carbon</topic><topic>carbon dioxide</topic><topic>catalysts</topic><topic>electricity</topic><topic>Electrochemical Techniques - methods</topic><topic>electrochemistry</topic><topic>electrodes</topic><topic>electrolytes</topic><topic>food chemistry</topic><topic>Fumigation</topic><topic>greenhouse gases</topic><topic>hydrogen peroxide</topic><topic>Hydrogen Peroxide - chemistry</topic><topic>Hydrolysis</topic><topic>Hydroxides - chemistry</topic><topic>methane</topic><topic>Pesticides - chemistry</topic><topic>soot</topic><topic>Sulfinic Acids - chemistry</topic><topic>sulfuryl fluoride</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weng, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Napier, Cade</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katte, Cedric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walse, Spencer S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitch, William A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weng, Cindy</au><au>Napier, Cade</au><au>Katte, Cedric</au><au>Walse, Spencer S.</au><au>Mitch, William A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electrochemical Generation of Hydroxide and Hydrogen Peroxide for Hydrolysis of Sulfuryl Fluoride Fumigant</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agricultural and food chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>J. Agric. Food Chem</addtitle><date>2024-07-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>27</issue><spage>15133</spage><epage>15141</epage><pages>15133-15141</pages><issn>0021-8561</issn><issn>1520-5118</issn><eissn>1520-5118</eissn><abstract>The post-harvest fumigant, sulfuryl fluoride (SO2F2), is a &gt;1000-fold more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide and methane. Pilot studies have shown that SO2F2 fumes vented from fumigation chambers can be captured and hydrolyzed by hydroxide (OH–) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) at pH ∼ 12 in a scrubber, producing SO4 2– and F– as waste salts. To reduce the costs and challenges associated with purchasing and mixing these reagents onsite, this study evaluates the electrochemical generation of OH– and H2O2 within spent scrubbing solution, taking advantage of the waste SO4 2– and F– as free sources of electrolyte. The study used a gas diffusion electrode constructed from carbon paper coated with carbon black as a catalyst selective for the reduction of O2 to H2O2. Under galvanostatic conditions, the study evaluated the effect of electrochemical conditions, including applied cathodic current density and electrolyte strength. Within an electrolyte containing 200 mM SO4 2– and 400 mM F–, comparable to the waste salts generated by a SO2F2 scrubbing event, the system produced 250 mM H2O2 at pH 12.6 within 4 h with a Faradaic efficiency of 98.8% for O2 reduction to H2O2. In a scrubbing-water sample from lab-scale fumigation, the system generated ∼200 mM H2O2 at pH 13.5 within 4 h with a Faradaic efficiency of 75.6%. A comparison of the costs to purchase NaOH and H2O2 against the electricity costs for electrochemical treatment indicated that the electrochemical approach could be 38–71% lower, depending on the local cost of electricity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>38944760</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.jafc.4c00864</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4917-0938</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4071-2515</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8561
ispartof Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2024-07, Vol.72 (27), p.15133-15141
issn 0021-8561
1520-5118
1520-5118
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3073712257
source MEDLINE; ACS Publications
subjects Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry
carbon
carbon dioxide
catalysts
electricity
Electrochemical Techniques - methods
electrochemistry
electrodes
electrolytes
food chemistry
Fumigation
greenhouse gases
hydrogen peroxide
Hydrogen Peroxide - chemistry
Hydrolysis
Hydroxides - chemistry
methane
Pesticides - chemistry
soot
Sulfinic Acids - chemistry
sulfuryl fluoride
title Electrochemical Generation of Hydroxide and Hydrogen Peroxide for Hydrolysis of Sulfuryl Fluoride Fumigant
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T21%3A41%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electrochemical%20Generation%20of%20Hydroxide%20and%20Hydrogen%20Peroxide%20for%20Hydrolysis%20of%20Sulfuryl%20Fluoride%20Fumigant&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agricultural%20and%20food%20chemistry&rft.au=Weng,%20Cindy&rft.date=2024-07-10&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=27&rft.spage=15133&rft.epage=15141&rft.pages=15133-15141&rft.issn=0021-8561&rft.eissn=1520-5118&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.jafc.4c00864&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3073712257%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3073712257&rft_id=info:pmid/38944760&rfr_iscdi=true