Electrochemical Generation of Hydroxide and Hydrogen Peroxide for Hydrolysis of Sulfuryl Fluoride Fumigant
The post-harvest fumigant, sulfuryl fluoride (SO2F2), is a >1000-fold more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide and methane. Pilot studies have shown that SO2F2 fumes vented from fumigation chambers can be captured and hydrolyzed by hydroxide (OH–) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) at pH ∼ 12 in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 2024-07, Vol.72 (27), p.15133-15141 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The post-harvest fumigant, sulfuryl fluoride (SO2F2), is a >1000-fold more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide and methane. Pilot studies have shown that SO2F2 fumes vented from fumigation chambers can be captured and hydrolyzed by hydroxide (OH–) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) at pH ∼ 12 in a scrubber, producing SO4 2– and F– as waste salts. To reduce the costs and challenges associated with purchasing and mixing these reagents onsite, this study evaluates the electrochemical generation of OH– and H2O2 within spent scrubbing solution, taking advantage of the waste SO4 2– and F– as free sources of electrolyte. The study used a gas diffusion electrode constructed from carbon paper coated with carbon black as a catalyst selective for the reduction of O2 to H2O2. Under galvanostatic conditions, the study evaluated the effect of electrochemical conditions, including applied cathodic current density and electrolyte strength. Within an electrolyte containing 200 mM SO4 2– and 400 mM F–, comparable to the waste salts generated by a SO2F2 scrubbing event, the system produced 250 mM H2O2 at pH 12.6 within 4 h with a Faradaic efficiency of 98.8% for O2 reduction to H2O2. In a scrubbing-water sample from lab-scale fumigation, the system generated ∼200 mM H2O2 at pH 13.5 within 4 h with a Faradaic efficiency of 75.6%. A comparison of the costs to purchase NaOH and H2O2 against the electricity costs for electrochemical treatment indicated that the electrochemical approach could be 38–71% lower, depending on the local cost of electricity. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-8561 1520-5118 1520-5118 |
DOI: | 10.1021/acs.jafc.4c00864 |