Major adverse kidney events in multidisciplinary chronic kidney disease care compared with usual outpatient care: a propensity score matched analysis

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a public health problem worldwide. Multidisciplinary care has been recommended in clinical practice to delay disease progression and minimize complications. However, the effectiveness of multidisciplinary care on major adverse kidney events in CKD patients is still in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of nephrology 2024-06
Hauptverfasser: Chittinandana, Palita, Gojaseni, Pongsathorn, Chuasuwan, Anan, Singprasert, Rattinan, Chailimpamontree, Worawon, Chittinandana, Anutra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a public health problem worldwide. Multidisciplinary care has been recommended in clinical practice to delay disease progression and minimize complications. However, the effectiveness of multidisciplinary care on major adverse kidney events in CKD patients is still inconclusive. We conducted a cohort study in patients with CKD stages G3b to 4 who were followed up at Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital from 2014 to 2020. Propensity score matching by age, sex, CKD staging, Diabetes Mellitus (DM), blood pressure and rate of estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) decline before inclusion between patients in multidisciplinary CKD care (MDC) and usual outpatient care (UOC) was performed. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular or renal mortality, 40% eGFR decline and initiation of long-term kidney replacement therapy. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 822 patients were included. Mean age was 70.9 years, 64% had diabetes. During the mean follow-up of 3.3 years, rate of reaching the primary endpoint was lower in the multidisciplinary CKD care group than in the usual outpatient care group (24.1% vs. 38.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.86; P = 0.002). The multidisciplinary CKD care group benefited more than the usual outpatient care group with regard to 40% eGFR decline (21.7% vs. 35.0%; HR, 0.67; 95%CI 0.52-0.88; P = 0.004), all-cause mortality (8.5% vs. 19.5%; HR, 0.60; 95%CI 0.40-0.90; P = 0.014), non-cardiovascular death (6.1% vs. 15.1%; HR, 0.56; 95%CI 0.35-0.90; P = 0.015) and hospitalizations per year (1.0 ± 1.5 vs. 1.6 ± 2.0; P 
ISSN:1724-6059
1724-6059
DOI:10.1007/s40620-024-01994-9