Case log trends of urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery fellows: A comparison of urology‐ and gynecology‐based fellowship programs

Aims Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (URPS) fellowship can be pursued after completion of either a urology (URO) or obstetrics and gynecology (GYN) residency. Our aim is to determine differences in graduating fellow cohort (GFC) case logs between URO‐ and GYN‐based URPS programs. Met...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurourology and urodynamics 2024-11, Vol.43 (8), p.1970-1976
Hauptverfasser: Tabakin, Alexandra L., Sawhney, Rohan, Daily, Adam M., Winkler, Harvey A., Shalom, Dara F., Tam, Justina, Lee, Wai
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aims Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (URPS) fellowship can be pursued after completion of either a urology (URO) or obstetrics and gynecology (GYN) residency. Our aim is to determine differences in graduating fellow cohort (GFC) case logs between URO‐ and GYN‐based URPS programs. Methods Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education case logs for URPS GFCs in both GYN‐ and URO‐based programs were analyzed for the 2019–2023 academic years (AY). Unpaired t‐tests with Welch's correction were used to compare annual mean logged cases between URO‐ versus GYN‐based GFCs for select surgical categories and the top 11 most logged index cases. Results GYN‐based GFCs logged more cases for all pelvic organ prolapse (POP) categories including surgery on apical POP, anterior wall POP, and posterior wall POP (all p 
ISSN:0733-2467
1520-6777
1520-6777
DOI:10.1002/nau.25533