Case log trends of urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery fellows: A comparison of urology‐ and gynecology‐based fellowship programs
Aims Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (URPS) fellowship can be pursued after completion of either a urology (URO) or obstetrics and gynecology (GYN) residency. Our aim is to determine differences in graduating fellow cohort (GFC) case logs between URO‐ and GYN‐based URPS programs. Met...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurourology and urodynamics 2024-11, Vol.43 (8), p.1970-1976 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aims
Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (URPS) fellowship can be pursued after completion of either a urology (URO) or obstetrics and gynecology (GYN) residency. Our aim is to determine differences in graduating fellow cohort (GFC) case logs between URO‐ and GYN‐based URPS programs.
Methods
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education case logs for URPS GFCs in both GYN‐ and URO‐based programs were analyzed for the 2019–2023 academic years (AY). Unpaired t‐tests with Welch's correction were used to compare annual mean logged cases between URO‐ versus GYN‐based GFCs for select surgical categories and the top 11 most logged index cases.
Results
GYN‐based GFCs logged more cases for all pelvic organ prolapse (POP) categories including surgery on apical POP, anterior wall POP, and posterior wall POP (all p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0733-2467 1520-6777 1520-6777 |
DOI: | 10.1002/nau.25533 |