Reanalysis of RNA sequencing data ends diagnostic odyssey and expands the phenotypic spectrum of congenital titinopathy

Although next‐generation sequencing has enabled diagnoses for many patients with Mendelian disorders, the majority remain undiagnosed. Here, we present a sibling pair who were clinically diagnosed with Escobar syndrome, however targeted gene testing was negative. Exome sequencing (ES), and later genome sequencing (GS), revealed compound heterozygous TTN variants in both siblings, a maternally inherited frameshift variant [(NM_133378.4):c.36812del; p.(Asp12271Valfs*10)], and a paternally inherited missense variant [(NM_133378.4):c.12322G > A; p.(Asp4108Asn)]. This result was considered nondiagnostic due to poor clinical fit and limited pathogenicity evidence for the missense variant of uncertain significance (VUS). Following initial nondiagnostic RNA sequencing (RNAseq) on muscle and further pursuit of other variants detected on the ES/GS, a reanalysis of noncanonical splice sites in the muscle transcriptome identified an out‐of‐frame exon retraction in TTN, near the known VUS. Interim literature included reports of patients with similar TTN variants who had phenotypic concordance with the siblings, and a diagnosis of a congenital titinopathy was given 4 years after the TTN variants had been initially reported. This report highlights the value of reanalysis of RNAseq with a different approach, expands the phenotypic spectrum of congenital titinopathy and also illustrates how a perceived phenotypic mismatch, and failure to consider known variants, can result in a prolongation of the diagnostic journey.