Comparison of two biological systems used for phototoxicity testing: Cellular and tissue

The OECD has approved two similar methods for testing the phototoxic potency of chemicals. The first method, OECD 432, is based on the cytotoxicity properties of materials to the mouse 3T3 (clone A31) cell line (fibroblasts) after exposure to light. The second method, OECD 498, is based on the same properties but using reconstructed human epidermis - EpiDerm (stratified keratinocytes). The aim of this study was to compare these two methods using statistical tests (specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value and accuracy) and non-statistical characteristics (e.g. price and experimental duration, amount of material, level of complications, cell type, irradiation dose). Both tests were performed according to the relevant guidelines using the same 11 control substances. Higher performance values were observed for OECD 432 in both phototoxic and non-phototoxic classifications. The accuracy of OECD 432 was 90.9%, while that of OECD 498 was 72.7%. OECD 432 was also shorter and less expensive. On the other hand, OECD 498 was less complicated, and used human cells with stratum corneum, which better reflects real skin. This method can also be used with oily substances that are poorly soluble in water. However, both methods are important for testing the phototoxic properties of materials, and can be used alone or in a tiered strategy. •Comparison of cell and tissue systems for phototoxicity testing.•Higher performance indicators for OECD 432 than for OECD 498.•OECD 432 is cheaper but more complicated than OECD 498.•OECD 498 has a wider application range than OECD 432.