Smoking status predicts anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: a systematic review & meta-analysis

Background Anastomotic leak after esophagectomy is a major contributor to surgery-related morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate if positive-smoking status is associated with the incidence of this complication. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, S...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2024-08, Vol.38 (8), p.4152-4159
Hauptverfasser: Bédard, Alexandre, Valji, Rahim H., Jogiat, Uzair, Verhoeff, Kevin, Turner, Simon R., Karmali, Shahzeer, Kung, Janice Y., Bédard, Eric L. R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Anastomotic leak after esophagectomy is a major contributor to surgery-related morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate if positive-smoking status is associated with the incidence of this complication. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library was performed on April 4th, 2023. Inclusion criteria comprised human participants undergoing esophagectomy, age ≥ 18, n  ≥ 5, and identification of smoking status. The primary outcome was incidence of anastomotic leak. Sub-group analysis by ex- or current smoking status was performed. Meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.4.1 using a Mantel–Haenszel random-effects model. Publication bias was evaluated visually with funnel plots and through the Egger test. Results A total of 220 abstracts were screened, of which 69 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility, with 13 studies selected for final inclusion. This included 16,103 patients, of which 4433 were ex- or current smokers, and 9141 were never smokers. Meta-analysis revealed an increased odds of anastomotic leak in patients with a positive-smoking status (current or ex-smokers) compared to never smokers (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.18–1.76, I 2  = 44%, p  
ISSN:0930-2794
1432-2218
1432-2218
DOI:10.1007/s00464-024-10988-4