Photobiomodulation and mesenchymal stem cell-conditioned medium for the repair of experimental critical-size defects

Orthopedic surgeons face a significant challenge in treating critical-size femoral defects (CSFD) caused by osteoporosis (OP), trauma, infection, or bone tumor resections. In this study for the first time, the application of photobiomodulation (PBM) and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-conditioned...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lasers in medical science 2024-06, Vol.39 (1), p.158
Hauptverfasser: Bayat, Mohammad, Asgari, Mehrdad, Abdollahifar, Mohammad-Amin, Moradi, Ali, Zare, Fatemeh, Kouhkheil, Reza, Gazor, Rouhallah, Ebrahiminia, Ali, Karbasaraea, Zahra Shahnazary, Chien, Sufan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Orthopedic surgeons face a significant challenge in treating critical-size femoral defects (CSFD) caused by osteoporosis (OP), trauma, infection, or bone tumor resections. In this study for the first time, the application of photobiomodulation (PBM) and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-conditioned medium (BM-MSC-CM) to improve the osteogenic characteristics of mineralized bone scaffold (MBS) in ovariectomy-induced osteoporotic (OVX) rats with a CSFD was tested. Five groups of OVX rats with CSFD were created: (1) Control (C); (2) MBS; (3) MBS + CM; (4) MBS + PBM; (5) MBS + CM + PBM. Computed tomography scans (CT scans), compression indentation tests, and histological and stereological analyses were carried out after euthanasia at 12 weeks following implantation surgery. The CT scan results showed that CSFD in the MBS + CM, MBS + PBM, and MBS + CM + PBM groups was significantly smaller compared to the control group ( p  = 0.01, p  = 0.04, and p  = 0.000, respectively). Moreover, the CSFD size was substantially smaller in the MBS + CM + PBM treatment group than in the MBS, MBS + CM, and MBS + PBM treatment groups ( p  = 0.004, p  = 0.04, and p  = 0.01, respectively). The MBS + PBM and MBS + CM + PBM treatments had significantly increased maximum force relative to the control group ( p  = 0.01 and p  = 0.03, respectively). Bending stiffness significantly increased in MBS ( p  = 0.006), MBS + CM, MBS + PBM, and MBS + CM + PBM treatments (all p  = 0.004) relative to the control group. All treatment groups had considerably higher new trabecular bone volume (NTBV) than the control group (all, p  = 0.004). Combined therapies with MBS + PBM and MBS + CM + PBM substantially increased the NTBV relative to the MBS group (all, p  = 0.004). The MBS + CM + PBM treatment had a markedly higher NTBV than the MBS + PBM ( p  = 0.006) and MBS + CM ( p  = 0.004) treatments. MBS + CM + PBM, MBS + PBM, and MBS + CM treatments significantly accelerated bone regeneration of CSFD in OVX rats. PBM + CM enhanced the osteogenesis of the MBS compared to other treatment groups.
ISSN:0268-8921
1435-604X
1435-604X
DOI:10.1007/s10103-024-04109-9