Multimodal integration of radiology and pathology signatures for distinguishing between aldosterone-producing adenomas and nonfunctional adrenal adenomas

Objective To develop and validate a nomogram combining radiomics and pathology features to distinguish between aldosterone-producing adenomas (APAs) and nonfunctional adrenal adenomas (NF-AAs). Methods Consecutive patients diagnosed with adrenal adenomas via computed tomography (CT) or pathologic an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Endocrine 2024-09, Vol.85 (3), p.1387-1397
Hauptverfasser: Piao, Zeyu, Liu, Tingting, Yang, Huijie, Meng, Mingzhu, Shi, Haifeng, Gao, Shenglin, Xue, Tongqing, Jia, Zhongzhi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To develop and validate a nomogram combining radiomics and pathology features to distinguish between aldosterone-producing adenomas (APAs) and nonfunctional adrenal adenomas (NF-AAs). Methods Consecutive patients diagnosed with adrenal adenomas via computed tomography (CT) or pathologic analysis between January 2011 and November 2022 were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective study. CT images and hematoxylin & eosin–stained slides were used for annotation and feature extraction. The selected radiomics and pathology features were used to develop a risk model using various machine learning models, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was determined to evaluate diagnostic performance. The predicted results from radiomics and pathology features were combined and visualized using a nomogram. Results A total of 211 patients (APAs, n  = 59; NF-AAs, n  = 152) were included in this study, with patients randomly divided into either the training set or the testing set at a ratio of 8:2. The ExtraTrees model yielded a sensitivity of 0.818, a specificity of 0.733, and an accuracy of 0.756 (AUC = 0.817; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.675–0.958) in the radiomics testing set and a sensitivity of 0.999, a specificity of 0.842, and an accuracy of 0.867 (AUC = 0.905, 95% CI: 0.792–1.000) in the pathology testing set. A nomogram combining radiomics and pathology features demonstrated a strong performance (AUC = 0.912; 95% CI: 0.807–1.000). Conclusion A nomogram combining radiomics and pathology features demonstrated strong predictive accuracy and discrimination capability. This model may help clinicians to distinguish between APAs and NF-AAs.
ISSN:1559-0100
1355-008X
1559-0100
DOI:10.1007/s12020-024-03827-y