Surgical outcomes and prognosis of HER2+ invasive breast cancer patients with a DCIS component treated with breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant systemic therapy

In up to 72 % of HER2+ invasive breast cancer (IBC), a ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) component is present. The presence of DCIS is associated with increased positive surgical margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The aim of this study was to assess surgical margins, recurrence and surviva...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of surgical oncology 2024-09, Vol.50 (9), p.108465, Article 108465
Hauptverfasser: Ploumen, Roxanne A.W., Claassens, Eva L., Kooreman, Loes F.S., Keymeulen, Kristien B.M.I., van Kats, Maartje A.C.E., van Kuijk, Sander M.J., Siesling, Sabine, van Nijnatten, Thiemo J.A., Smidt, Marjolein L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In up to 72 % of HER2+ invasive breast cancer (IBC), a ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) component is present. The presence of DCIS is associated with increased positive surgical margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The aim of this study was to assess surgical margins, recurrence and survival in a nationwide cohort of HER2+ IBC with versus without a DCIS component, treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) and BCS. Women diagnosed with HER2+ IBC treated with NST and BCS, between 2010 and 2019, were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and linked to the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to determine locoregional recurrence rate (LRR) and overall survival (OS) and associated clinicopathological variables. Surgical outcomes and prognosis were compared between IBC only and IBC+DCIS. A total of 3056 patients were included: 1832 with IBC and 1224 with IBC+DCIS. Patients with IBC+DCIS had significantly more often positive surgical margins compared to IBC (12.8 % versus 4.9 %, p 
ISSN:0748-7983
1532-2157
1532-2157
DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108465