Postoperative Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Cancer Surgery: United States versus International Medical Graduates

We sought to characterize postoperative outcomes among patients who underwent an oncologic operation relative to whether the treating surgeon was an international medical graduate (IMG) versus a United States medical graduate (USMG). IMGs comprise approximately one-quarter of the physician workforce...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgery 2024-06, Vol.280 (3), p.514
Hauptverfasser: Khan, Muhammad Muntazir Mehdi, Munir, Muhammad Musaab, Woldesenbet, Selamawit, Khalil, Mujtaba, Endo, Yutaka, Katayama, Erryk, Tsilimigras, Diamantis, Rashid, Zayed, Altaf, Abdullah, Dillhoff, Mary, Tsai, Susan, Pawlik, Timothy M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We sought to characterize postoperative outcomes among patients who underwent an oncologic operation relative to whether the treating surgeon was an international medical graduate (IMG) versus a United States medical graduate (USMG). IMGs comprise approximately one-quarter of the physician workforce in the United States. The 100% Medicare Standard Analytic Files were utilized to extract data on patients with breast, lung, hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB), and colorectal cancer who underwent surgical resection between 2014 and 2020. Entropy balancing (EB) and multivariable regression analysis were performed to evaluate the association between postoperative outcomes among USMG and IMG surgeons. Among 285,930 beneficiaries, 242,914 (85.0%) and 43,016 (15.0%) underwent surgery by a USMG and IMG surgeon, respectively. Overall, 129,576 (45.3%) individuals were male, and 168,848 (59.1%) patients had a Charlson Comorbidity Index score >2. Notably, IMG surgeons were more likely to care for racial/ethnic minority patients (14.7% vs. 12.5%) and those with a high social vulnerability index (33.3% vs. 32.1%) (all P
ISSN:0003-4932
1528-1140
1528-1140
DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006384