Proposal for an optimised definition of adverse pathology (unfavourable histology) that predicts metastatic risk in prostatic adenocarcinoma independent of grade group and pathological stage

Aims Histological grading of prostate cancer is a powerful prognostic tool, but current criteria for grade assignment are not fully optimised. Our goal was to develop and test a simplified histological grading model, based heavily on large cribriform/intraductal carcinoma, with optimised sensitivity...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Histopathology 2024-10, Vol.85 (4), p.598-613
Hauptverfasser: Nguyen, Jane K, Harik, Lara R, Klein, Eric A, Li, Jianbo, Corrigan, Dillon, Liu, Shiguang, Chan, Emily, Hawley, Sarah, Auman, Heidi, Newcomb, Lisa F, Carroll, Peter R, Cooperberg, Matthew R, Filson, Christopher P, Simko, Jeff P, Nelson, Peter S, Tretiakova, Maria S, Troyer, Dean, True, Lawrence D, Vakar‐Lopez, Funda, Weight, Christopher J, Lin, Daniel W, Brooks, James D, McKenney, Jesse K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aims Histological grading of prostate cancer is a powerful prognostic tool, but current criteria for grade assignment are not fully optimised. Our goal was to develop and test a simplified histological grading model, based heavily on large cribriform/intraductal carcinoma, with optimised sensitivity for predicting metastatic potential. Methods and results Two separate non‐overlapping cohorts were identified: a 419‐patient post‐radical prostatectomy cohort with long term clinical follow‐up and a 209‐patient post‐radical prostatectomy cohort in which all patients had pathologically confirmed metastatic disease. All prostatectomies were re‐reviewed for high‐risk histological patterns of carcinoma termed ‘unfavourable histology’. Unfavourable histology is defined by any classic Gleason pattern 5 component, any large cribriform morphology (> 0.25 mm) or intraductal carcinoma, complex intraluminal papillary architecture, grade 3 stromogenic carcinoma and complex anastomosing cord‐like growth. For the outcome cohort, Kaplan–Meier analysis compared biochemical recurrence, metastasis and death between subjects with favourable and unfavourable histology, stratified by pathological stage and grade group. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models evaluated adding unfavourable histology to the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) post‐prostatectomy nomogram and stratification by percentage of unfavourable histology. At 15 years unfavourable histology predicted biochemical recurrence, with sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 88%, metastatic disease at 100 and 48% and death at 100 and 46%. Grade group 2 prostate cancers with unfavourable histology were associated with metastasis independent of pathological stage, while those without had no risk. Histological models for prediction of metastasis based on only large cribriform/intraductal carcinoma or increasing diameter of cribriform size improved specificity, but with lower sensitivity. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models demonstrated that unfavourable histology significantly improved discriminatory power of the MSKCC post‐prostatectomy nomogram for biochemical failure (likelihood ratio test P 
ISSN:0309-0167
1365-2559
1365-2559
DOI:10.1111/his.15231