Atlantoaxial intra-articular cage fusion by posterior intermuscular approach for treating reducible atlantoaxial dislocation: a technique note with case series

Purpose To evaluate the clinical feasibility of atlantoaxial intra-articular cage (AIC) fusion via intermuscular approach for treating reducible atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD). Methods An analysis was conducted on the data of 10 patients who underwent C1-C2 segmental fixation and AIC fusion for AAD...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European spine journal 2024-08, Vol.33 (8), p.3060-3068
Hauptverfasser: Xu, Zhenji, Wu, Ji, Chen, Fei, Ding, Yiyang, Ni, Bin, Xu, Peng, Guo, Qunfeng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To evaluate the clinical feasibility of atlantoaxial intra-articular cage (AIC) fusion via intermuscular approach for treating reducible atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD). Methods An analysis was conducted on the data of 10 patients who underwent C1-C2 segmental fixation and AIC fusion for AAD by unilateral intermuscular approach and contralateral open approach. Outcome assessments included Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA) and Visual Analog Scale Score for Neck Pain (VASSNP). The duration of surgical exposure, screw insertion and cage insertion, and postoperative drainage volume were also compared between two approaches. Bone fusion was evaluated through computed tomography (CT) reconstruction. Postoperative paravertebral tissue edema was evaluated by paravertebral tissue cross-sectional area (CSA) and signal intensity on T2 weighted sequence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3 days postoperatively. Results The intermuscular approach exhibited a longer exposure time but lower drainage postoperatively compared to the open approach ( P  
ISSN:0940-6719
1432-0932
1432-0932
DOI:10.1007/s00586-024-08318-2