Contact aspiration for basilar artery occlusion safely reduces the puncture-to-recanalization time

Effective thrombectomies in the posterior circulation remain controversial. Previous reports have demonstrated the superiority of contact aspiration in anterior circulation. Aspiration catheters and stent retrievers are often used alone on a global scale, while combined techniques are commonly used...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical neurology and neurosurgery 2024-07, Vol.242, p.108331, Article 108331
Hauptverfasser: Hirota, Shin, Fujita, Kyohei, Ishiwada, Tadahiro, Takahashi, Satoru, Hirai, Sakyo, Sagawa, Hirotaka, Wakabayashi, Hikaru, Aoyama, Jiro, Fujii, Shoko, Yamaoka, Hiroto, Yoshimura, Masataka, Shigeta, Keigo, Sato, Yohei, Sawada, Kana, Yamada, Kenji, Yamamura, Toshihiro, Ishii, Yosuke, Obata, Yoshiki, Hara, Mutsuya, Kawano, Yoshihisa, Yamamoto, Shinji, Nemoto, Shigeru, Sumita, Kazutaka
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Effective thrombectomies in the posterior circulation remain controversial. Previous reports have demonstrated the superiority of contact aspiration in anterior circulation. Aspiration catheters and stent retrievers are often used alone on a global scale, while combined techniques are commonly used in Japan. This study evaluated the effect of first-line contact aspiration with other strategies for the treatment of basilar artery occlusion. The primary outcome was the frequency of the first-pass effect, and the secondary outcome was the time from puncture to the first-pass effect. A multicenter observational registry including 16 Japanese stroke centers was used. Between December 2013 and February 2021, enrolled patients underwent endovascular thrombectomy for basilar artery occlusion. The efficacy of contact aspiration compared to other methods (including stent retrievers and combined techniques) was evaluated. Eighty-four patients were included, all of whom had achieved effective recanalization. Twenty-six patients were treated with contact aspiration, 13 with combined technique, and 45 with stent retrievers. The two groups: contact aspiration and non-contact aspiration, had different backgrounds. Both had similar frequencies of effective recanalization and first-pass effects. The contact aspiration group experienced better functional outcomes without statistical significance, while this strategy was significantly associated with a shorter puncture-to-recanalization time (38 vs. 55 minutes, P=0.036). In particular, in the 55 patients with the first-pass effect, multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that contact aspiration was significantly associated with a shorter time from puncture to first-pass effect, independent of age and etiology of large-artery atherosclerosis (hazard ratio 2.02, 95% confidence intervals 1.10–3.69, P=0.023). This study suggested that contact aspiration for basilar artery occlusion may shorten the puncture-to-first-pass effect, compared to stent retrievers and combined techniques. •First pass effect after mechanical thrombectomy for basilar artery occlusion was achieved 65.5%.•Puncture-to-recanalization time was 38 [16–62] minutes the contact aspiration group.•Contact aspiration for basilar artery occlusion may shorten the puncture-to-first-pass effect.
ISSN:0303-8467
1872-6968
1872-6968
DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108331