Comparison of current to past outcomes in congenital diaphragmatic hernia using MRI observed-to-expected total fetal lung volume
Background Fetal Centers use imaging studies to predict congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) prognosis and the need for fetal therapy. Given improving CDH survival, we hypothesized that current fetal imaging severity predictions no longer reflect true outcomes and fail to justify the risks of fetal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of perinatology 2024-09, Vol.44 (9), p.1347-1352 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Fetal Centers use imaging studies to predict congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) prognosis and the need for fetal therapy. Given improving CDH survival, we hypothesized that current fetal imaging severity predictions no longer reflect true outcomes and fail to justify the risks of fetal therapy.
Methods
We analyzed our single-center contemporary data in a left-sided CDH cohort (
n
= 58) by prognostic criteria determined by MRI observed-to-expected total fetal lung volumes: severe 35%. We compared contemporary survival to prior studies and the TOTAL trials.
Results
Contemporary survival was significantly higher than past studies for all prognostic classifications (mild 100% vs 80–94%, moderate 95% vs 59–75%, severe 79% vs 13–25%;
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0743-8346 1476-5543 1476-5543 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41372-024-02008-z |