Comparison of current to past outcomes in congenital diaphragmatic hernia using MRI observed-to-expected total fetal lung volume

Background Fetal Centers use imaging studies to predict congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) prognosis and the need for fetal therapy. Given improving CDH survival, we hypothesized that current fetal imaging severity predictions no longer reflect true outcomes and fail to justify the risks of fetal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of perinatology 2024-09, Vol.44 (9), p.1347-1352
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Michelle J., Ellsworth, Tanner S., Woodward, Paula J., Kennedy, Anne M., Fenton, Stephen J., Russell, Katie W., Byrne, Janice L. B., Yost, Christian C., Yoder, Bradley A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Fetal Centers use imaging studies to predict congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) prognosis and the need for fetal therapy. Given improving CDH survival, we hypothesized that current fetal imaging severity predictions no longer reflect true outcomes and fail to justify the risks of fetal therapy. Methods We analyzed our single-center contemporary data in a left-sided CDH cohort ( n  = 58) by prognostic criteria determined by MRI observed-to-expected total fetal lung volumes: severe 35%. We compared contemporary survival to prior studies and the TOTAL trials. Results Contemporary survival was significantly higher than past studies for all prognostic classifications (mild 100% vs 80–94%, moderate 95% vs 59–75%, severe 79% vs 13–25%; P  
ISSN:0743-8346
1476-5543
1476-5543
DOI:10.1038/s41372-024-02008-z