Limitations of the commercially available gene expression test in predicting cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma metastasis and clinical outcomes

Clinical genetic tests are integral to healthcare decision-making. To critically evaluate the DecisionDx cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma test by Castle Biosciences for its dataset biases, gene panel selection, and reported accuracy metrics, providing insight into broader challenges in the clinical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2024-05
Hauptverfasser: Sax, Joel L., McFarland, Christopher D., Carroll, Bryan T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Clinical genetic tests are integral to healthcare decision-making. To critically evaluate the DecisionDx cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma test by Castle Biosciences for its dataset biases, gene panel selection, and reported accuracy metrics, providing insight into broader challenges in the clinical genetic testing landscape. Independent analyses of the DecisionDx-SCC 40-GEP test data from Castle Biosciences were conducted. These included comparisons to clinical genetic testing standards, analysis of prevalence metrics against national cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) rates, gene ontology of 34 genes for cSCC associations, and evaluation of accuracy metrics. The DecisionDx-SCC dataset showed a metastasis prevalence higher than the national average. Out of 34 genes, 15 had known associations with cSCC. Inconsistencies in the presentation of accuracy metrics were noted, particularly in moderate and high-risk stratifications. Analysis of DecisionDx-SCC indicates potential biases and ambiguities. This highlights the need for systematic validation, stressing the necessity for precise and dependable genetic testing in patient care.
ISSN:0190-9622
1097-6787
1097-6787
DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2024.05.014