Retrospective chart review of GI bleeding in people with von Willebrand disease

Introduction Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding events (BEs) in von Willebrand disease (VWD) are difficult to diagnose and often recurrent. Limited data from clinical trials has led to lack of consensus on treatment options. Aim Describe current treatments and outcomes for GI BEs in people with VWD. Met...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia 2024-07, Vol.30 (4), p.970-980
Hauptverfasser: Roberts, Jonathan C., Escobar, Miguel A., Acharya, Suchitra, Hwang, Nina X., Wang, Michael, Hale, Sarah, Brighton, Sarah, Kouides, Peter A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding events (BEs) in von Willebrand disease (VWD) are difficult to diagnose and often recurrent. Limited data from clinical trials has led to lack of consensus on treatment options. Aim Describe current treatments and outcomes for GI BEs in people with VWD. Methods This retrospective, observational, multicentre chart review study was conducted from January 2018 through December 2019 and included patients with inherited VWD with ≥1 GI BE in the preceding 5 years. Baseline characteristics, number and aetiology of BEs, associated GI‐specific morbidities/lesions, treatment and outcomes were analysed descriptively. Results Sixty bleeds were reported in 20 patients with type 1 (20%), type 2 (50%) and type 3 (30%) VWD. During the 5‐year study period, 31 (52%) BEs had one identified or suspected cause; multiple causes were reported in 11 (18%). Most GI BEs (72%) were treated with a combination of von Willebrand factor (VWF), antifibrinolytics and/or other haemostatic or non‐haemostatic treatments. Time to resolution did not differ by VWF treatment use; however, BEs treated with non‐VWF treatments tended to resolve later. In patients with GI‐specific morbidities/lesions, 84% resolved with first‐line treatment; time to resolution tended to be longer than in patients without such morbidities/lesions. Thirteen BEs occurred in patients receiving prophylaxis and 47 in patients receiving on‐demand treatment; 18 BEs resulted in a switch to prophylaxis after bleed resolution. Conclusions This study confirms the unmet need for the management of recurrent GI BEs in people with VWD and the need for prospective data, especially on prophylaxis.
ISSN:1351-8216
1365-2516
1365-2516
DOI:10.1111/hae.15034