Retrospective chart review of GI bleeding in people with von Willebrand disease
Introduction Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding events (BEs) in von Willebrand disease (VWD) are difficult to diagnose and often recurrent. Limited data from clinical trials has led to lack of consensus on treatment options. Aim Describe current treatments and outcomes for GI BEs in people with VWD. Met...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia 2024-07, Vol.30 (4), p.970-980 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction
Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding events (BEs) in von Willebrand disease (VWD) are difficult to diagnose and often recurrent. Limited data from clinical trials has led to lack of consensus on treatment options.
Aim
Describe current treatments and outcomes for GI BEs in people with VWD.
Methods
This retrospective, observational, multicentre chart review study was conducted from January 2018 through December 2019 and included patients with inherited VWD with ≥1 GI BE in the preceding 5 years. Baseline characteristics, number and aetiology of BEs, associated GI‐specific morbidities/lesions, treatment and outcomes were analysed descriptively.
Results
Sixty bleeds were reported in 20 patients with type 1 (20%), type 2 (50%) and type 3 (30%) VWD. During the 5‐year study period, 31 (52%) BEs had one identified or suspected cause; multiple causes were reported in 11 (18%). Most GI BEs (72%) were treated with a combination of von Willebrand factor (VWF), antifibrinolytics and/or other haemostatic or non‐haemostatic treatments. Time to resolution did not differ by VWF treatment use; however, BEs treated with non‐VWF treatments tended to resolve later. In patients with GI‐specific morbidities/lesions, 84% resolved with first‐line treatment; time to resolution tended to be longer than in patients without such morbidities/lesions. Thirteen BEs occurred in patients receiving prophylaxis and 47 in patients receiving on‐demand treatment; 18 BEs resulted in a switch to prophylaxis after bleed resolution.
Conclusions
This study confirms the unmet need for the management of recurrent GI BEs in people with VWD and the need for prospective data, especially on prophylaxis. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1351-8216 1365-2516 1365-2516 |
DOI: | 10.1111/hae.15034 |