Trends in specific procedures performed at the time of cytoreduction for ovarian cancer: Is interval debulking surgery truly less radical? A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Team Ovary study

To evaluate procedures performed during primary debulking surgery (PDS) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) for ovarian cancer. Patients surgically treated at our institution for newly diagnosed stage IIIC/IV epithelial ovarian cancer between 6/1/2015–12/31/2021 were identified using a prospectivel...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology 2024-08, Vol.187, p.80-84
Hauptverfasser: Filippova, Olga T., Boecking, Katherine, Broach, Vance, Gardner, Ginger J., Sonoda, Yukio, Chi, Dennis S., Zivanovic, Oliver, Long Roche, Kara
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate procedures performed during primary debulking surgery (PDS) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) for ovarian cancer. Patients surgically treated at our institution for newly diagnosed stage IIIC/IV epithelial ovarian cancer between 6/1/2015–12/31/2021 were identified using a prospectively collected database. Patients were triaged to PDS or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by IDS using an institutional algorithm. Data on specific procedures performed, including consultants called, were collected from operative and pathology reports. Appropriate statistical analyses were applied. Overall, 467 patients underwent PDS and 434 underwent IDS; 76% (PDS) and 71% (IDS) of cases achieved complete gross resection. Comparing PDS vs IDS cohorts, median age was 63 years (range, 23–86) vs 67 years (range, 35–95), 79% vs 86% of patients had high-grade serous histology, and 38% vs 70% had stage IV disease. Most procedures (except ostomy, distal pancreatectomy) were more common during PDS (P 
ISSN:0090-8258
1095-6859
1095-6859
DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.05.009