Interpretation of SPECT wall motion with deep learning
We sought to develop a novel deep learning (DL) workflow to interpret single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) wall motion. Wall motion assessment with SPECT is limited by image temporal and spatial resolution. Visual interpretation of wall motion can be subjective and prone to error. Arti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of nuclear cardiology 2024-07, Vol.37, p.101881, Article 101881 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We sought to develop a novel deep learning (DL) workflow to interpret single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) wall motion.
Wall motion assessment with SPECT is limited by image temporal and spatial resolution. Visual interpretation of wall motion can be subjective and prone to error. Artificial intelligence (AI) may improve accuracy of wall motion assessment.
A total of 1038 patients undergoing rest electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated SPECT and echocardiography were included. Using echocardiography as truth, a DL-model (DL-model 1) was trained to predict the probability of abnormal wall motion. Of the 1038 patients, 317 were used to train a DL-model (DL-model 2) to assess regional wall motion. A 10-fold cross-validation was adopted. Diagnostic performance of DL was compared with human readers and quantitative parameters.
The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy (ACC) of DL model (AUC: .82 [95% CI: .79-.85]; ACC: .88) were higher than human (AUC: .77 [95% CI: .73-.81]; ACC: .82; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1071-3581 1532-6551 1532-6551 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2024.101881 |