A randomized, double‐blind trial assessing the efficacy and safety of two doses of dulaglutide in Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes (AWARD‐JPN)
Aim To assess the efficacy and safety of dulaglutide 1.5 mg versus dulaglutide 0.75 mg in Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Materials and Methods A Phase 3, multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group study was conducted in Japanese participants aged ≥20 years, with T2D for...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diabetes, obesity & metabolism obesity & metabolism, 2024-08, Vol.26 (8), p.3167-3175 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aim
To assess the efficacy and safety of dulaglutide 1.5 mg versus dulaglutide 0.75 mg in Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Materials and Methods
A Phase 3, multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group study was conducted in Japanese participants aged ≥20 years, with T2D for ≥6 months and inadequate glycaemic control, while on a single oral antihyperglycaemic medication (NCT04809220). The primary objective was to evaluate superiority of dulaglutide 1.5 mg versus dulaglutide 0.75 mg measured by mean change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to 26 weeks. Other efficacy and safety endpoints were evaluated at 26 and 52 weeks. All statistical analyses were conducted using the intention‐to‐treat population.
Results
Overall, 591 participants were randomized to once‐weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg or 0.75 mg. At Week 26, dulaglutide 1.5 mg was superior to dulaglutide 0.75 mg in HbA1c reduction from baseline (least squares mean [LSM] difference −0.29% [95% confidence interval {CI} −0.43, −0.14]). At Week 52, the dulaglutide 1.5‐mg arm had a significantly greater proportion of participants who achieved HbA1c |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1462-8902 1463-1326 1463-1326 |
DOI: | 10.1111/dom.15644 |