Comparison of estimated glomerular filtration rate change with sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitors versus glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists among people with diabetes: A propensity‐score matching study

Aim To compare the risk of developing kidney outcomes with use of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1RAs) versus use of sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitors among individuals with diabetes. Materials and Methods In this retrospective observational study, we analysed 12 338...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes, obesity & metabolism obesity & metabolism, 2024-06, Vol.26 (6), p.2422-2430
Hauptverfasser: Suzuki, Yuta, Kaneko, Hidehiro, Nagasawa, Hajime, Okada, Akira, Fujiu, Katsuhito, Jo, Taisuke, Takeda, Norifumi, Morita, Hiroyuki, Nishiyama, Akira, Gohda, Tomohito, Suzuki, Yusuke, Node, Koichi, Yasunaga, Hideo, Nangaku, Masaomi, Komuro, Issei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim To compare the risk of developing kidney outcomes with use of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1RAs) versus use of sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitors among individuals with diabetes. Materials and Methods In this retrospective observational study, we analysed 12 338 individuals with diabetes who newly initiated SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP‐1RAs using data from the JMDC claims database. The primary outcome was change in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), estimated using a linear mixed‐effects model. A 1:4 propensity‐score‐matching algorithm was used to compare the changes in eGFR between GLP‐1RA and SGLT2 inhibitor users. Results After propensity‐score matching, 2549 individuals (median [range] age 52 [46–58] years, 80.6% men) were analysed (510 GLP‐1RA new users and 2039 SGLT2 inhibitor new users). SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with a slower eGFR decline when compared with GLP‐1RA use (−1.41 [95% confidence interval −1.63 to −1.19] mL/min/1.73 m2 vs. −2.62 [95% confidence interval −3.15 to −2.10] mL/min/1.73 m2). Conclusions Our analysis demonstrates the potential advantages of SGLT2 inhibitors over GLP‐1RAs in terms of kidney outcomes in individuals with diabetes.
ISSN:1462-8902
1463-1326
1463-1326
DOI:10.1111/dom.15561