A phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of Nuvastatic (C50SEW505OESA), a standardized rosmarinic acid-rich polymolecular botanical extract formulation to reduce cancer-related fatigue in patients with solid tumors

Aim We evaluated the efficacy and safety of Nuvastatic™ (C5OSEW5050ESA) in improving cancer-related fatigue (CRF) among cancer patients. Methods This multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase 2 trial included 110 solid malignant tumor patients (stage II–IV) undergoing chemotherapy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Supportive care in cancer 2024-06, Vol.32 (6), p.331, Article 331
Hauptverfasser: Ng, Mei Ling, Majid, Amin Malik Shah Abdul, Yee, Siew Mei, Natesan, V., Basheer, Mohamed Khadeer Ahamed, Gnanasekaran, Ashok, Al-Suede, Fouad Saleih Resq, Parish, Christopher, Dalal, Meena, Ming, Long Chiau, Nazari V, Mansoureh, Khan, Shamsuddin Sultan, STN Hameed Sultan, Siti Balkees, Babu, K Govind, Majid, Aman Shah Abdul, Abdul Aziz, Mohamed Amir Shah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim We evaluated the efficacy and safety of Nuvastatic™ (C5OSEW5050ESA) in improving cancer-related fatigue (CRF) among cancer patients. Methods This multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase 2 trial included 110 solid malignant tumor patients (stage II–IV) undergoing chemotherapy. They were randomly selected and provided oral Nuvastatic™ 1000 mg ( N  = 56) or placebo ( N  = 54) thrice daily for 9 weeks. The primary outcomes were fatigue (Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)) and Visual Analog Scale for Fatigue (VAS-F)) scores measured before and after intervention at baseline and weeks 3, 6, and 9. The secondary outcomes were mean group difference in the vitality subscale of the Medical Outcome Scale Short Form-36 (SF-36) and urinary F2-isoprostane concentration (an oxidative stress biomarker), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores, adverse events, and biochemical and hematologic parameters. Analysis was performed by intention-to-treat (ITT). Primary and secondary outcomes were assessed by two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (mixed ANOVA). Results The Nuvastatic™ group exhibited an overall decreased fatigue score compared with the placebo group. Compared with the placebo group, the Nuvastatic™ group significantly reduced BFI-fatigue (BFI fatigue score, F (1.4, 147) = 16.554, p  
ISSN:0941-4355
1433-7339
1433-7339
DOI:10.1007/s00520-024-08536-w