Doubly Robust Causal Modeling to Evaluate Device Implantation

Evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is the standard for evaluating treatment safety and efficacy. However, observational studies using large databases are increasingly being used due to their greater generalizability and feasibility. These studies are threatened by confounders, which are...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of internal medicine (1960) 2024-07, Vol.184 (7), p.834-835
Hauptverfasser: Shardell, Michelle, Chen, Chixiang, McCoy, Rozalina G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is the standard for evaluating treatment safety and efficacy. However, observational studies using large databases are increasingly being used due to their greater generalizability and feasibility. These studies are threatened by confounders, which are factors that affect the treatment group and outcome. Statistical approaches can control for confounders by modeling their associations with the treatment, or both. Correctly specifying these models is challenging, and model misspecification can lead to residual confounding. Doubly robust approaches model associations of confounders with both the treatment and outcome, providing two opportunities to correctly model confounders.
ISSN:2168-6106
2168-6114
2168-6114
DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.1181