Catheter Ablation as First-Line Therapy in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Patient Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes

In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF), antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) are considered a first-line rhythm-control strategy, whereas catheter ablation is a reasonable alternative. This study sought to examine the prevalence, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes of patients wit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JACC. Clinical electrophysiology 2024-06, Vol.10 (6), p.1078
Hauptverfasser: Barkagan, Michael, Milman, Anat, Zahavi, Guy, Younis, Arwa, Dhakal, Bishnu, Dixit, Sanjay, Wong, Christopher X, Gerstenfeld, Edward P, Narayan, Sanjiv M, Bunch, Jared T, Cerbin, Lukasz, Tzou, Wendy S, Metzl, Mark, Khanani, Aqeel, Siddiqui, Usman R, Mohanty, Sanghamitra, Natale, Andrea, Medina, Aaron, Anter, Elad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF), antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) are considered a first-line rhythm-control strategy, whereas catheter ablation is a reasonable alternative. This study sought to examine the prevalence, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes of patients with PerAF who underwent catheter ablation as a first or second-line strategy. This multicenter observational study included consecutive patients with PerAF who underwent first-time ablation between January 2020 and September 2021 in 9 medical centers in the United States. Patients were divided into those who underwent ablation as first-line therapy and those who had ablation as second-line therapy. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. A total of 2,083 patients underwent first-time ablation for PerAF. Of these, 1,086 (52%) underwent ablation as a first-line rhythm-control treatment. Compared with patients treated with AADs as first-line therapy, these patients were predominantly male (72.6% vs 68.1%; P = 0.03), with a lower frequency of hypertension (64.0% vs 73.4%; P 
ISSN:2405-5018
2405-5018
DOI:10.1016/j.jacep.2024.02.035