Dapagliflozin and quality of life measured using the EuroQol 5‐dimension questionnaire in patients with heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced/preserved ejection fraction

ABSTRACT Aims Although much is known about the usefulness of heart failure (HF)‐specific instruments for assessing patient well‐being, less is known about the value of generic instruments for the measurement of health‐related quality of life (HRQL) in HF. The aim of this study was to assess the rela...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of heart failure 2024-07, Vol.26 (7), p.1524-1538
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Mingming, Kondo, Toru, Talebi, Atefeh, Jhund, Pardeep S., Docherty, Kieran F., Claggett, Brian L., Vaduganathan, Muthiah, Bachus, Erasmus, Hernandez, Adrian F., Lam, Carolyn S.P., Inzucchi, Silvio E., Martinez, Felipe A., Boer, Rudolf A., Kosiborod, Mikhail N., Desai, Akshay S., Køber, Lars, Ponikowski, Piotr, Sabatine, Marc S., Solomon, Scott D., McMurray, John J.V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACT Aims Although much is known about the usefulness of heart failure (HF)‐specific instruments for assessing patient well‐being, less is known about the value of generic instruments for the measurement of health‐related quality of life (HRQL) in HF. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between the EuroQol 5‐dimension 5‐level (EQ‐5D‐5L) visual analogue scale (VAS) and index scores, clinical characteristics, and outcomes in patients with HF and the effect of dapagliflozin on these scores. Methods and results We performed a patient‐level pooled analysis of the DAPA‐HF and DELIVER trials, which investigated the effectiveness and safety of dapagliflozin in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and mildly reduced/preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF), respectively. Patients reporting higher (better) EQ‐5D‐5L VAS and index scores had a lower prevalence of comorbidities, including atrial fibrillation and hypertension, than patients with a worse score. They were also more likely to have better investigator‐reported (New York Heart Association class) and patient‐self‐reported (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire) health status and lower median N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide levels. Compared to patients with the lowest scores (Q1), those with higher EQ‐5D‐5L VAS scores had better outcomes: the hazard ratio for the composite of cardiovascular death or worsening HF was 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.72–0.91) in Q2, 0.74 (0.65–0.84) in Q3, and 0.62 (0.54–0.72) in Q4. The risk of each component of the composite outcome, and all‐cause death, was also lower in patients with better scores. Similar findings were observed for the index score. Treatment with dapagliflozin improved both EQ‐5D‐5L VAS and index scores across the range of ejection fraction. Conclusions Both higher (better) EQ‐5D‐5L VAS and index scores were associated with better outcomes. Dapagliflozin treatment improved EQ‐5D‐5L VAS and index scores, irrespective of ejection fraction. Heath status measured using the EuroQol 5‐dimension 5‐level (EQ‐5D‐5L) questionnaire in patients with heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced/preserved ejection fraction. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) adjusted for baseline value was performed to test for the treatment effect. CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation; VAS, visual analogue scale.
ISSN:1388-9842
1879-0844
1879-0844
DOI:10.1002/ejhf.3263