A study of polarity effect for various ionization chambers in kilovoltage x‐ray beams

Background Ionization chambers play an essential role in dosimetry measurements for kilovoltage (kV) x‐ray beams. Despite their widespread use, there is limited data on the absolute values for the polarity correction factors across a range of commonly employed ionization chambers. Purpose This study aimed to investigate the polarity effects for five different ionization chambers in kV x‐ray beams. Methods Two plane‐parallel chambers being the Advanced Markus and Roos and three cylindrical chambers; 3D PinPoint, Semiflex and Farmer chamber (PTW, Freiburg, Germany), were employed to measure the polarity correction factors. The kV x‐ray beams were produced from an Xstrahl 300 unit (Xstrahl Ltd., UK). All measurements were acquired at 2 cm depth in a PTW‐MP1 water tank for beams between 60 kVp (HVL 1.29 mm Al) and 300 kVp (HVL 3.08 mm Cu), and field sizes of 2–10 cm diameter for 30 cm focus‐source distance (FSD) and 4 × 4 cm2 – 20 × 20 cm2 for 50 cm FSD. The ionization chambers were connected to a PTW‐UNIDOS electrometer, and the polarity effect was determined using the AAPM TG‐61 code of practice methodology. Results The study revealed significant polarity effects in ionization chambers, especially in those with smaller volumes. For the plane‐parallel chambers, the Advanced Markus chamber exhibited a maximum polarity effect of 2.5%, whereas the Roos chamber showed 0.3% at 150 KVp with the 10 cm circular diameter open‐ended applicator. Among the cylindrical chambers at the same beam energy and applicator, the Pinpoint chamber exhibited a 3% polarity effect, followed by Semiflex with 1.7%, and Farmer with 0.4%. However, as the beam energy increased to 300 kVp, the polarity effect significantly increased reaching 8.5% for the Advanced Markus chamber and 13.5% for the PinPoint chamber at a 20 × 20 cm2 field size. Notably, the magnitude of the polarity effect increased with both the field size and beam energy, and was significantly influenced by the size of the chamber's sensitive volume. Conclusions The findings demonstrate that ionization chambers can exhibit substantial polarity effects in kV x‐ray beams, particularly for those chambers with smaller volumes. Therefore, it is important to account for polarity corrections when conducting relative dose measurements in kV x‐ray beams to enhance the dosimetry accuracy and improve patient dose calculations.