Robotic versus Laparoscopic Liver Resections for Colorectal Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide, and the liver is the most common localization of metastatic disease. The incidence of minimally invasive liver surgery is increasing, and robotic surgery (RLR) is believed to overcome some limitations of a laparoscopic approach (LRL). We p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Cancers 2024-04, Vol.16 (8), p.1596
Hauptverfasser:	Safiejko, Kamil, Pedziwiatr, Michal, Pruc, Michal, Tarkowski, Radoslaw, Juchimiuk, Marcin, Domurat, Marian, Smereka, Jacek, Anvarov, Khikmat, Sielicki, Przemyslaw, Kurek, Krzysztof, Szarpak, Lukasz
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Bias Blood transfusions Cancer surgery Citation management software Colorectal cancer Colorectal carcinoma Hospitals Laparoscopy Laparotomy Length of stay Liver cancer Localization Medical research Meta-analysis Metastases Metastasis Morbidity Mortality Patients Robotic surgery Survival Systematic review
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide, and the liver is the most common localization of metastatic disease. The incidence of minimally invasive liver surgery is increasing, and robotic surgery (RLR) is believed to overcome some limitations of a laparoscopic approach (LRL). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of operative and short-term oncologic outcomes of the laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. An online search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane databases was performed. Eight studies involving 3210 patients were considered eligible for the meta-analysis. In the LRL group, a higher conversion to open rate (12.4%) was observed compared to the RLR (6.7%; =
ISSN:	2072-6694 2072-6694
DOI:	10.3390/cancers16081596