Root canal conicity determination of primary second molars using nanotomography: An in vitro study

Background The conicity of the root canals of primary teeth is an important measure for endodontic therapies. However, determining this conicity depends on the methods employed, which requires further investigation. Aim The aim of this study was to determine the conicity of the root canals of the up...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of paediatric dentistry 2025-01, Vol.35 (1), p.33-44
Hauptverfasser: Lucisano, Marília Pacífico, Ramos, Gilmer Torres, Blanco‐Victorio, Daniel José, Ramírez‐Sotelo, Laura Ricardina, Lima, Ricardo Barbosa, Nelson‐Filho, Paulo, Silva, Raquel Assed Bezerra, Miranda, Jessica Arieta, Silva, Léa Assed Bezerra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The conicity of the root canals of primary teeth is an important measure for endodontic therapies. However, determining this conicity depends on the methods employed, which requires further investigation. Aim The aim of this study was to determine the conicity of the root canals of the upper and lower primary second molars using nanotomography (nCT). Design An in vitro study was performed using nine primary second molars, both upper and lower, subjected to nCT. Comparisons between the diameters of root canals were performed between the thirds (cervical—D0, middle—D5, and apical—D7). The conicity (%) was determined for each root canal from cervical to apical. Data were statistically analyzed with a significance level of 5%. Results The conicity ranged from 2% to 8% for the upper primary second molars. Significant differences in root canal diameter between the thirds (D0, D5, and D7 points) were observed in the mesio‐ and distobuccal roots (p  .05). For the lower primary second molars, the conicity ranged from 2% to 17%, as well as significant differences in root canal diameter between the thirds (D0, D5, and D7 points) were observed in all roots (distal, mesiobuccal, and mesiolingual; p 
ISSN:0960-7439
1365-263X
1365-263X
DOI:10.1111/ipd.13198